Author Topic: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT  (Read 3050 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« on: January 02, 2013, 08:23:21 PM »

Offline frosty33

  • Tyler Zeller
  • Posts: 39
  • Tommy Points: 2
why don't we have this guy yet? only 31 yrs old, he's a rebound and blocking machine, and he rides the pine on the bucks bench!!!! i'm sure we could get him for a 2nd round pick (except he's making almost 7 mil this yr) DANNY..... WAKE UP!!!

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2013, 08:29:05 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 35202
  • Tommy Points: 1674
I wonder if there was a way Danny could trade Jason Terry (and keep Lee/Bass instead) for Dalembert. Maybe in a three team deal for a piece or expiring contract that suits Milwaukee better than Terry does.

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2013, 08:48:14 PM »

Offline Lightskinsmurf

  • NCE
  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1949
  • Tommy Points: 134
I wonder if there was a way Danny could trade Jason Terry (and keep Lee/Bass instead) for Dalembert. Maybe in a three team deal for a piece or expiring contract that suits Milwaukee better than Terry does.

Id rather keep terry than keep bass.

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2013, 08:51:30 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13099
  • Tommy Points: 840
why don't we have this guy yet? only 31 yrs old, he's a rebound and blocking machine, and he rides the pine on the bucks bench!!!! i'm sure we could get him for a 2nd round pick (except he's making almost 7 mil this yr) DANNY..... WAKE UP!!!
So if he's such a "rebounding and blocking machine", why can't he get off the pine on the woeful Bucks, who have no center other than Larry Sanders?
Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2013, 08:54:05 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
I wonder if there was a way Danny could trade Jason Terry (and keep Lee/Bass instead) for Dalembert. Maybe in a three team deal for a piece or expiring contract that suits Milwaukee better than Terry does.

Feel like Jason Terry would object to spending his last years in Milwaukee.

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2013, 09:02:11 PM »

Offline BadNewsBarnes

  • Brandon Bass
  • Posts: 182
  • Tommy Points: 41
I've always liked Dalembert.  He would definitely help.  And the Bucks are not that bad, they're 16-13 and currently the #6 seed in the east.

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2013, 09:03:54 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4438
  • Tommy Points: 653
No way I'd trade Terry for Dalembert.

Bass/Lee and a Pick, sure.

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2013, 09:34:38 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15490
  • Tommy Points: 3483
Dalembert won't solve this team's problems.  he'd be an improvement over Collins but this team needs more than just this one so-so guy,

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2013, 09:46:19 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8008
  • Tommy Points: 229
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
I'd give them Green, lol

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #9 on: January 02, 2013, 09:52:59 PM »

Offline ssspence

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5946
  • Tommy Points: 366
I wonder if there was a way Danny could trade Jason Terry (and keep Lee/Bass instead) for Dalembert. Maybe in a three team deal for a piece or expiring contract that suits Milwaukee better than Terry does.

Feel like Jason Terry would object to spending his last years in Milwaukee.

He can tear up his contract when he gets there if he likes, though I seriously doubt he would.

Lee is the best fit for the Bucks, but I don't see Danny giving him up for a buyout candidate.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2013, 10:05:13 PM by ssspence »

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #10 on: January 02, 2013, 10:34:38 PM »

Offline rocknrollforyoursoul

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3677
  • Tommy Points: 330
I wonder if there was a way Danny could trade Jason Terry (and keep Lee/Bass instead) for Dalembert. Maybe in a three team deal for a piece or expiring contract that suits Milwaukee better than Terry does.

Feel like Jason Terry would object to spending his last years in Milwaukee.

We object to having such a mediocre team to cheer for.  ;D
"There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.'"

"You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body."

— C.S. Lewis


Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2013, 10:50:02 PM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
I wonder if there was a way Danny could trade Jason Terry (and keep Lee/Bass instead) for Dalembert. Maybe in a three team deal for a piece or expiring contract that suits Milwaukee better than Terry does.

Feel like Jason Terry would object to spending his last years in Milwaukee.

He can tear up his contract when he gets there if he likes, though I seriously doubt he would.

Lee is the best fit for the Bucks, but I don't see Danny giving him up for a buyout candidate.

I mean, The Bucks clearly would contact Terry before making a trade. They're not going to move Dalembert if the return is someone who isn't going to play for them

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2013, 11:35:40 PM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9052
  • Tommy Points: 1037
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
why don't we have this guy yet? only 31 yrs old, he's a rebound and blocking machine, and he rides the pine on the bucks bench!!!! i'm sure we could get him for a 2nd round pick (except he's making almost 7 mil this yr) DANNY..... WAKE UP!!!
So if he's such a "rebounding and blocking machine", why can't he get off the pine on the woeful Bucks, who have no center other than Larry Sanders?

Completely agree.

I think everyone is expecting "few years ago" Sammy D. He wasnt really as good In Houstonand is now getting benched.

Id personally rather have Haywood. He's not the sexiest name but he can be a solid backup C. He'll be available for cheap too I guess.
"The rim is looking bigger and bigger every game." - PP

DKC Warriors Roster
http://tinyurl.com/ksomu8m


Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2013, 11:37:12 PM »

Online rondohondo

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9447
  • Tommy Points: 977
why don't we have this guy yet? only 31 yrs old, he's a rebound and blocking machine, and he rides the pine on the bucks bench!!!! i'm sure we could get him for a 2nd round pick (except he's making almost 7 mil this yr) DANNY..... WAKE UP!!!
So if he's such a "rebounding and blocking machine", why can't he get off the pine on the woeful Bucks, who have no center other than Larry Sanders?

Completely agree.

I think everyone is expecting "few years ago" Sammy D. He wasnt really as good In Houstonand is now getting benched.

Id personally rather have Haywood. He's not the sexiest name but he can be a solid backup C. He'll be available for cheap too I guess.

Haywood can't be traded this year because Bobcats picked him up through Dallas amnestying him.

Re: solution to our problems: SAMUEL DALEMBERT
« Reply #14 on: January 02, 2013, 11:38:17 PM »

Offline lightspeed5

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Tommy Points: 283
dalembert is a joke. he cant even play for the bucks. ****.