CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsAround the LeagueTrade Ideas and Rumors3 Way Deal Bos/Tor/Sac (Simmons Idea)
Page: 1 [2] 3 4 5   
Author Topic: 3 Way Deal Bos/Tor/Sac (Simmons Idea)  (Read 8699 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Who
Bob Cousy
**************************

Tommy Points: 1113
Online Online

Posts: 26617


Email
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2013, 06:28:37 PM »

It's an awful trade idea that no chance of happening because of Toronto.

The Boston-Sacramento part is a credible idea. Whether you'd do it or not is another matter. But at least it is a genuine and realistic idea.

However, the Toronto part of the exchange is absolutely ridiculous. Lowry by himself for Tyreke is an overpay at this point in time. DeRozan by himself for Tyreke is really good value for Sacramento. The two of them together for Tyreke? Ridiculous.
Nothing to see here

Kansas City - 7.4, 8.9, 9.4, 10.9, 11.4, 12.9

G - Magic Johnson
G - Andrew Toney
F - Bernard King
F - Larry Nance, Cedric Maxwell
C - Jack Sikma
bfrombleacher
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 324
Offline Offline

Posts: 2714


Email
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2013, 06:30:06 PM »

I would prefer Tyreke Evans to Kyle Lowry. Tyreke has more star talent.

This and also if we did not include Fab Melo. We're giving up the best player right here on the best contract.
Nothing to see here
StartOrien
Danny Ainge
**********

Tommy Points: 906
Offline Offline

Posts: 10091



Email
« Reply #17 on: January 02, 2013, 06:32:39 PM »

I would prefer Tyreke Evans to Kyle Lowry. Tyreke has more star talent.

And trade that sees Rondo go out for Cousins is going to be one for the future rather than a win now move so the guard with more potential is the more valuable asset than the superior win-now player in K.Lowry.

I'm not sure I agree with this. The height that DMC and Garnett bring to us could give teams fits, and give us an advantage over the Heat that we really don't have right now.

Plus, the defensive combo of Lowry and Bradley would be fantastic. Two incredible on-ball defenders giving backcourts nightmare.
Nothing to see here
gpap
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 76
Offline Offline

Posts: 1427


Email
« Reply #18 on: January 02, 2013, 06:34:37 PM »

I'd do it.
Nothing to see here
blackbird
Courtney Lee


Tommy Points: 52
Offline Offline

Posts: 232



Email
« Reply #19 on: January 02, 2013, 06:40:35 PM »

The only reason to trade Rondo would be to dump Jeff Green as well. Any trade that ships out Rondo and keeps an albatross on the roster is a non-starter, IMO.
Nothing to see here
ssspence
Don Chaney
***

Tommy Points: 229
Offline Offline

Posts: 3854


James Naismith to Dickey Betts for the jam.....


Email
« Reply #20 on: January 02, 2013, 06:47:17 PM »

I'd rather not have Lowry, and its hard to imagine Toronto being interested.
Nothing to see here
Roy H.
Forums Manager
Dennis Johnson
******************

Tommy Points: -29962
Online Online

Posts: 18489


33,333 posts and counting . . .


Email
« Reply #21 on: January 02, 2013, 06:48:09 PM »

I don't like it much for Toronto.
Nothing to see here


All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat.  CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012
Atzar
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 133
Offline Offline

Posts: 2417


Email
« Reply #22 on: January 02, 2013, 06:50:10 PM »

The only reason to trade Rondo would be to dump Jeff Green as well. Any trade that ships out Rondo and keeps an albatross on the roster is a non-starter, IMO.

lol, how is he already an albatross?  Can we at least wait a season or so before we decide that he already failed?

The guy's coming off of heart surgery.  I want more from him too, but let's be reasonable here.
Nothing to see here

Pick 2 Washington Wizards 63.3/70.3M  Coach:  Doc Rivers
PG: Tony Parker 12.5M / Ramon Sessions 5M / Tony Wroten 1.1M
SG: Danny Green 3.5M / Gary Neal .9M / Jeremy Lamb 2M
SF: Thabo Sefolosha 3.6M / Carlos Delfino 3M / Moe Harkless 1.7M
PF: Tristan Thompson 3.9M / Marreese Speights 4.2M
C: Pau Gasol 19M / Bismack Biyombo 2.9M
StartOrien
Danny Ainge
**********

Tommy Points: 906
Offline Offline

Posts: 10091



Email
« Reply #23 on: January 02, 2013, 07:04:10 PM »

I don't like it much for Toronto.

What if it was Calderon instead of Lowry?
Nothing to see here
Roy H.
Forums Manager
Dennis Johnson
******************

Tommy Points: -29962
Online Online

Posts: 18489


33,333 posts and counting . . .


Email
« Reply #24 on: January 02, 2013, 07:07:37 PM »

I don't like it much for Toronto.

What if it was Calderon instead of Lowry?

Then I wouldn't like it for Boston.
Nothing to see here


All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Once a CrotoNat, always a CrotoNat.  CelticsBlog Draft Champions, 2009 & 2012
rutzan
Rajon Rondo


Tommy Points: 71
Offline Offline

Posts: 503


Email
« Reply #25 on: January 02, 2013, 07:09:09 PM »

i have been saying for days now that sactown will try a 3-team trade involving cousins and evans but repeatedly shot down...i duly expect the obligatory defamation of simmon's character...or mine...no worries...as a pre-requisite rationalization...rondo is too high a price for what we are getting in this though...
Nothing to see here
Who
Bob Cousy
**************************

Tommy Points: 1113
Online Online

Posts: 26617


Email
« Reply #26 on: January 02, 2013, 07:13:06 PM »

I don't think Tyreke and Calderon could co-exist.

Calderon, he needs a quite a bit of time on the ball to take advantage of his skills as a floor general, leader and facilitator offensively. Tyreke's game isn't conducive to that type of PG play. Too weak off the ball. Far too reliant on having the ball in his hands.

I think Lowry and Tyreke would work well together. Lowry is more of a scorer than Calderon. Can go and off the ball with greater ease without losing a large amount of his own individual effectiveness (unlike Calderon). Lowry and Tyreke would complement one another well. Give you a nice 1-2 punch in a pick and roll orientated offense.
Nothing to see here

Kansas City - 7.4, 8.9, 9.4, 10.9, 11.4, 12.9

G - Magic Johnson
G - Andrew Toney
F - Bernard King
F - Larry Nance, Cedric Maxwell
C - Jack Sikma
Evantime34
Antoine Walker
*****

Tommy Points: 165
Online Online

Posts: 5293


Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft


Email
« Reply #27 on: January 02, 2013, 07:20:38 PM »

I don't like it for Toronto unless they are getting two firsts in addition.
Nothing to see here

Visit our NBA blog at pickandpopdiaries.blogspot.com and follow us on twitter at @picknpopdiaries
1. Chris Paul, Norris Cole
2. Iman Shumpert, Marcus Thornton
3. Kyle Korver, Corey Brewer, Victor Claver
4. Blake Griffin, Thomas Robinson
5. Larry Sanders, Greg Stiemsma, Tomfy Mozgov
syfy9
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 248
Offline Offline

Posts: 1382


We might as well put Tyrion in at center.


Email
« Reply #28 on: January 02, 2013, 07:32:29 PM »

Kyle Lowry is injury prone, but that's the only reason I wouldn't do it.
Nothing to see here

With the 16th pick of the 2013 NBA Draft, the Boston Celtics select Daenerys Targaryen (and her 3 dragons + 8000 Unsullied) from the continent of Essos!
StartOrien
Danny Ainge
**********

Tommy Points: 906
Offline Offline

Posts: 10091



Email
« Reply #29 on: January 02, 2013, 09:15:24 PM »

I don't like it much for Toronto.

What if it was Calderon instead of Lowry?

Then I wouldn't like it for Boston.

I think I'd do it, though I suspect I'd be in the minority. I really like the idea of combining Garnett and Cousins. Two great post players, two very capable passers. The offense would be a thing of beauty.
Nothing to see here
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines