CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsAround the LeagueTrade Ideas and RumorsDMC Destinations
Page: [1] 2   
Author Topic: DMC Destinations  (Read 2146 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
rutzan
Rajon Rondo


Tommy Points: 71
Offline Offline

Posts: 503


Email
« on: December 31, 2012, 08:42:43 PM »

1)Charlotte
2)Boston
3)Dallas or Orlando

Can someone show me how Dallas or Orlando leapfrogs us or Charlotte?

Are there any other darkhorses out there?
Nothing to see here
Who
Bob Cousy
**************************

Tommy Points: 1115
Offline Offline

Posts: 26708


Email
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2012, 08:54:27 PM »

You forgot Sacramento. I still think Cousins is far more likely to stay in Sacramento than he is to leave. For now at least.

Maybe next summer or sometime next season or the summer after that. I think Cousins will leave Sacramento. I just don't think that time has arrived yet. The problems there have been bad but I am not convinced they are ready yet to give up on a big man with as much talent and potential as Cousins has just yet. I think this Kings + Cousins story has another few chapters to play out first.
Nothing to see here

Kansas City - Lenny Wilkens

G - Magic Johnson, Gerald Henderson
G - Andrew Toney, Freddie Brown, Clint Richardson
F - Bernard King, Cedric Maxwell, Bobby Gross
F - Larry Nance, Alvan Adams
C - Jack Sikma, Marvin Webster
CelticHooligan3
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 130
Offline Offline

Posts: 1073



Email
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2012, 09:09:35 PM »

I thought we were considered the front runners.. No?
Nothing to see here
rutzan
Rajon Rondo


Tommy Points: 71
Offline Offline

Posts: 503


Email
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2012, 09:11:13 PM »

i put charlotte number one so that i do not get my hopes up too high
Nothing to see here
mqtcelticsfan
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 127
Offline Offline

Posts: 1380


Email
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2012, 09:12:55 PM »

I thought we were considered the front runners.. No?

With what? The Kings have no need for Pierce/Garnett, Rondo is likely too much, and nobody else is worth anything even remotely close to Cousins.
Nothing to see here
rutzan
Rajon Rondo


Tommy Points: 71
Offline Offline

Posts: 503


Email
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2012, 09:18:01 PM »

teams often think in cycles...first going going for talent...then...going for character...i think the pendulum is swinging now in both directions...sacto tired of the drama wanting young talent and character...that is...bradley, sully...we need superior talent and need to swing for the fences with dmc...the perfect storm...so to speak...sacto is tired of the risk...we need the reward...it's the classic risk vs reward....but you also have the sell high and buy low dynamic...
« Last Edit: December 31, 2012, 09:29:14 PM by rutzan » Nothing to see here
lightspeed5
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 212
Online Online

Posts: 2711



Email
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2012, 09:33:25 PM »

I thought we were considered the front runners.. No?

With what? The Kings have no need for Pierce/Garnett, Rondo is likely too much, and nobody else is worth anything even remotely close to Cousins.
are you kidding me? since when was KG, rondo, or pierce in any of the cousins trade rumors? its been about avery bradley and maybe add sullinger...  both that match cousins salary
Nothing to see here

mqtcelticsfan
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 127
Offline Offline

Posts: 1380


Email
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2012, 09:36:22 PM »

I thought we were considered the front runners.. No?

With what? The Kings have no need for Pierce/Garnett, Rondo is likely too much, and nobody else is worth anything even remotely close to Cousins.
are you kidding me? since when was KG, rondo, or pierce in any of the cousins trade rumors? its been about avery bradley and maybe add sullinger...  both that match cousins salary

I don't agree with the idea that Bradley and Sullinger are enough to get it done. Our players are either not good enough, too good or a terrible fit.
Nothing to see here
Neurotic Guy
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 848
Offline Offline

Posts: 6335


Email
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2012, 11:21:49 PM »

There is no way to be sure what Sac will take for Cousins.  Question is, do we really want him?  I think Danny makes a low ball pitch and sees where it leads.  While others are maneuvering for Cousins, I hope Danny swoops in and gets Gortat. 
Nothing to see here
SHAQATTACK
NCE
Antoine Walker
*****

Tommy Points: 324
Offline Offline

Posts: 5019



Email
« Reply #9 on: December 31, 2012, 11:53:33 PM »

I'm praying its Boston.  :)
Nothing to see here
KGs Knee
Don Chaney
***

Tommy Points: 261
Offline Offline

Posts: 3563


Email
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2013, 12:24:10 AM »

i put charlotte number one so that i do not get my hopes up too high


Yeah, I'd agree.

Charlotte seems to have the ability to put together the best package (of the teams rumored to be bidding).  The question is whether or not they acually want Cousins badly enough to give their best offer.

This of course, depends on how deperate Sacramento really is.  The best thing for them is still, somehow, getting Cousins to get his head straight.  I'd be willing to bet Sacramento ends up unhappy with proposals, tries to convince themselves it's still salvagable, and keeps him (for now).
Nothing to see here
pearljammer10
Jim Loscutoff
********

Tommy Points: 407
Online Online

Posts: 8089



Email
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2013, 01:45:52 AM »

I thought we were considered the front runners.. No?

With what? The Kings have no need for Pierce/Garnett, Rondo is likely too much, and nobody else is worth anything even remotely close to Cousins.
are you kidding me? since when was KG, rondo, or pierce in any of the cousins trade rumors? its been about avery bradley and maybe add sullinger...  both that match cousins salary

Yeah but where have any "legit" rumors come from? The only mention of sully and or Bradley for cousins I've heard has been from celtics blog.
Nothing to see here
KGs Knee
Don Chaney
***

Tommy Points: 261
Offline Offline

Posts: 3563


Email
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2013, 02:53:55 PM »

i put charlotte number one so that i do not get my hopes up too high


Yeah, I'd agree.

Charlotte seems to have the ability to put together the best package (of the teams rumored to be bidding).  The question is whether or not they acually want Cousins badly enough to give their best offer.

This of course, depends on how deperate Sacramento really is.  The best thing for them is still, somehow, getting Cousins to get his head straight.  I'd be willing to bet Sacramento ends up unhappy with proposals, tries to convince themselves it's still salvagable, and keeps him (for now).

I remind all.

Cousins has come back with a renewed purpose and attitude.  How long it lasts remains to be seen, though.

Either way, he has posted some big numbers in the past 5 games.
Nothing to see here
Fan from VT
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 552
Offline Offline

Posts: 2879


Email
« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2013, 03:38:50 PM »

I think us getting Cousins depends on 1 of 2 things:

1. Sac gives up Tyreke and Cousins for Rondo + something that isn't Bradley, and either it really clicks with Bradley being the defense for Tyreke's score first PG tactics and boston thrives with PP and Tyreke being the scorers/creators and KG/Bradley the defense, and Cousins the rebounder/benefiting from no double teams/better spacing. Or, Tyreke is flipped to a 3rd team that can give up more of a pure PG and wants to take a risk on Tyreke's potential to be a star. This could include Phoenix (Dragic), Toronto (Lowry), Atlanta (Teauge plus something), Milwaukee (Jennings).

2. Sac really likes our youngs, and we are willing to give up Bradley, Sully, and a First for Cousins.
Nothing to see here
triboy16f
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 80
Offline Offline

Posts: 1759


Email
« Reply #14 on: January 05, 2013, 03:47:48 PM »

why are we on this still??

Sac is not trading Cousins. After the suspension he needed to or needs to mess up one more time. Then we can think about having even a chance to trade for him

Right now, after the suspension matter, Sac has been playing very well. DMC has been playing very well. He is considered their franchise player

You got to give up Rondo for him , and celts won't be doing that

Nothing to see here
Pages: [1] 2   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines