Author Topic: better trade idea!  (Read 770 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dunisho

  • Keith Bogans
  • Posts: 50
  • Tommy Points: 5
better trade idea!
« on: December 26, 2012, 08:11:02 PM »
boston-bulls-bucks 3-team trade...

boston gets s.dalembert
boston loses bass and collins

bulls gets bass, gooden
bulls trade away boozer..

bucks receives boozer
bucks loses gooden, dalembert

why would boston do it?  Get a center that they can actually use beside KG upfront... and dalembert is an expiring contract...

why would chicago do it?  Boozer's 15 mil per year off the books.  They get 2 PF for the price smaller than Boozer's...

why would bucks do it?  They never use gooden and dalembert's role is shrinking with larry sanders emerging...they get someone who can actually help with the scoring...

just add some other players to balance the salaries... perhaps include some picks... i think this is 1 good trade...

Offline Who

  • Larry Bird
  • *****************************
  • Posts: 29102
  • Tommy Points: 1210
Re: better trade idea!
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2012, 08:24:17 PM »
Why does Chicago want to trade Boozer for two far worse players?

Bass and Gooden combine to make $14 million a season for as long as Boozer's contract lasts. The Bulls don't save nearly enough money (around $3 million) to justify the talent downgrade.

I don't see why Milwaukee would want to take on Boozer's salary either. Dalembert comes off the books this summer. So they'd be trading Gooden's $7 million for Boozer's $15-16 million for the next two years. Boozer is an upgrade but he is not a big enough upgrade for Milwaukee to justify that type of payroll increase. Especially when you consider they still have Ilyasova on a big contract and several young big men who all need minutes already available there.

It looks to me like Boston is the only team making out in this deal.

Offline lightspeed5

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • ****
  • Posts: 4078
  • Tommy Points: 283
Re: better trade idea!
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2012, 10:00:32 PM »
bulls laugh on the phone

these 3 team trade ideas are always super unrealistic

Online AB_Celtic

  • Ray Allen
  • **
  • Posts: 2498
  • Tommy Points: 342
  • DKC Commish
Re: better trade idea!
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2012, 08:05:03 PM »
Uh... where'd Collins go?
DKC League Chicago Bulls - co-Commissioner
Avery Bradley, Wes Matthews, Nicolas Batum, Taj Gibson, Joakim Noah
Greivis Vasquez, Jerryd Bayless, Jimmy Butler, Ed Davis, Joel Freeland
[Derrick Rose]

2014 Pick 2 Indiana Pacers - Commissioner
2013 CB Draft Cleveland Cavs - Eastern Conference Champs!

Offline pearljammer10

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9431
  • Tommy Points: 556
Re: better trade idea!
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2012, 09:36:42 PM »
Why does Chicago want to trade Boozer for two far worse players?

Bass and Gooden combine to make $14 million a season for as long as Boozer's contract lasts. The Bulls don't save nearly enough money (around $3 million) to justify the talent downgrade.

I don't see why Milwaukee would want to take on Boozer's salary either. Dalembert comes off the books this summer. So they'd be trading Gooden's $7 million for Boozer's $15-16 million for the next two years. Boozer is an upgrade but he is not a big enough upgrade for Milwaukee to justify that type of payroll increase. Especially when you consider they still have Ilyasova on a big contract and several young big men who all need minutes already available there.

It looks to me like Boston is the only team making out in this deal.

Yeah terrible deal for the Bulls. Could we get Gooden and Dalembert together?
DKC: GM Boston Celtics
PICK 2: Trail Blazers
PG: Lillard/ReggieJackson
SG: D. Green/Miller/Wroten
SF: Leonard/Prince
PF: Aldridge/Diaw
C:  Noah/Birdman/Perkins

 

Hello! Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.

Welcome to CelticsBlog