CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsCeltics BasketballCeltics Talkbetter trade idea!
Page: [1]   
Author Topic: better trade idea!  (Read 613 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
dunisho
Avery Bradley


Tommy Points: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 50


Email
« on: December 26, 2012, 08:11:02 PM »

boston-bulls-bucks 3-team trade...

boston gets s.dalembert
boston loses bass and collins

bulls gets bass, gooden
bulls trade away boozer..

bucks receives boozer
bucks loses gooden, dalembert

why would boston do it?  Get a center that they can actually use beside KG upfront... and dalembert is an expiring contract...

why would chicago do it?  Boozer's 15 mil per year off the books.  They get 2 PF for the price smaller than Boozer's...

why would bucks do it?  They never use gooden and dalembert's role is shrinking with larry sanders emerging...they get someone who can actually help with the scoring...

just add some other players to balance the salaries... perhaps include some picks... i think this is 1 good trade...
Nothing to see here
Who
Bob Cousy
**************************

Tommy Points: 1112
Offline Offline

Posts: 26613


Email
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2012, 08:24:17 PM »

Why does Chicago want to trade Boozer for two far worse players?

Bass and Gooden combine to make $14 million a season for as long as Boozer's contract lasts. The Bulls don't save nearly enough money (around $3 million) to justify the talent downgrade.

I don't see why Milwaukee would want to take on Boozer's salary either. Dalembert comes off the books this summer. So they'd be trading Gooden's $7 million for Boozer's $15-16 million for the next two years. Boozer is an upgrade but he is not a big enough upgrade for Milwaukee to justify that type of payroll increase. Especially when you consider they still have Ilyasova on a big contract and several young big men who all need minutes already available there.

It looks to me like Boston is the only team making out in this deal.
Nothing to see here

Kansas City - 7.4, 8.9, 9.4, 10.9, 11.4, 12.9

G - Magic Johnson
G - Andrew Toney
F - Bernard King
F - Larry Nance, Cedric Maxwell
C - Jack Sikma
lightspeed5
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 210
Offline Offline

Posts: 2689



Email
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2012, 10:00:32 PM »

bulls laugh on the phone

these 3 team trade ideas are always super unrealistic
Nothing to see here

AB_Celtic
Paul Pierce
*

Tommy Points: 140
Offline Offline

Posts: 1263


Hey Doc/Danny: I'm 5'11" let me play center


Email
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2012, 08:05:03 PM »

Uh... where'd Collins go?
Nothing to see here

2013 Historical Draft: Washington Bullets
Coach: Phil Jackson
Guards: Sleepy Floyd (86-87), Walter Davis (78-79)
Wings: Jamaal Wilkes (76-77), Paul Pressey (85-86)
Bigs: Bob McAdoo (74-75), Artis Gilmore (77-78)
7.12, 8.1, 9.12, 10.1, 11.12, 12.1
pearljammer10
Jim Loscutoff
********

Tommy Points: 407
Offline Offline

Posts: 8026



Email
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2012, 09:36:42 PM »

Why does Chicago want to trade Boozer for two far worse players?

Bass and Gooden combine to make $14 million a season for as long as Boozer's contract lasts. The Bulls don't save nearly enough money (around $3 million) to justify the talent downgrade.

I don't see why Milwaukee would want to take on Boozer's salary either. Dalembert comes off the books this summer. So they'd be trading Gooden's $7 million for Boozer's $15-16 million for the next two years. Boozer is an upgrade but he is not a big enough upgrade for Milwaukee to justify that type of payroll increase. Especially when you consider they still have Ilyasova on a big contract and several young big men who all need minutes already available there.

It looks to me like Boston is the only team making out in this deal.

Yeah terrible deal for the Bulls. Could we get Gooden and Dalembert together?
Nothing to see here
Pages: [1]   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines