Author Topic: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25  (Read 48566 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #30 on: December 25, 2012, 12:16:23 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11446
  • Tommy Points: 5349
  • Thumper of the BASS!
i like collins

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #31 on: December 25, 2012, 12:17:05 PM »

Offline OsirusCeltics

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2013
  • Tommy Points: 198
Never thought I'd say this, but Collins is doing really well out there...

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #32 on: December 25, 2012, 12:19:07 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21216
  • Tommy Points: 2450
With Collins on the floor, it's four against five on offense.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #33 on: December 25, 2012, 12:19:18 PM »

Offline cltc5

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7054
  • Tommy Points: 445
We coulda had Blatche, but Ya know, and not take on any head cases ::)

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #34 on: December 25, 2012, 12:20:29 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
Question, how is something a no-call when someone passes the ball before running through a defender? How does that change things at all? Running through a defender, with or without ball is illegal contact, right?

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #35 on: December 25, 2012, 12:21:22 PM »

Offline Q_FBE

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2317
  • Tommy Points: 243
Celtics show more urgency at the outset . THAT is a  good thing. I take that back. We are slow and unathletic and not playing well.
The beatings will continue until morale improves

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #36 on: December 25, 2012, 12:22:59 PM »

Offline lon3lytoaster

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4608
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Word aapp!
Those two fouls on Collins seemed kind of bad..

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #37 on: December 25, 2012, 12:23:08 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18699
  • Tommy Points: 1818
Question, how is something a no-call when someone passes the ball before running through a defender? How does that change things at all? Running through a defender, with or without ball is illegal contact, right?

Yeah, that made no sense. What I think is incorrectly called is when they run through a defender who hasn't been set. In those cases I'd say a no call or a defensive foul, same as if the player had the ball in his hands.

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #38 on: December 25, 2012, 12:23:42 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21216
  • Tommy Points: 2450
Those two fouls on Collins seemed kind of bad..
put in the d-league guy
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #39 on: December 25, 2012, 12:24:41 PM »

Offline lon3lytoaster

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4608
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Word aapp!
I really like our warmup jackets. Might have to see if I can buy one.

Also really like saying Varnado.

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #40 on: December 25, 2012, 12:26:26 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21216
  • Tommy Points: 2450
I don't understand why Sully can't get some post looks.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #41 on: December 25, 2012, 12:26:48 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
Question, how is something a no-call when someone passes the ball before running through a defender? How does that change things at all? Running through a defender, with or without ball is illegal contact, right?

Yeah, that made no sense. What I think is incorrectly called is when they run through a defender who hasn't been set. In those cases I'd say a no call or a defensive foul, same as if the player had the ball in his hands.
A ref in my rec league once called that, said my screen didn't warrant a call because the guy passed the ball before he ran me over like a freight train.

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #42 on: December 25, 2012, 12:28:14 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21216
  • Tommy Points: 2450
Don't leave Stackhouse in the corner!
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #43 on: December 25, 2012, 12:28:33 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18699
  • Tommy Points: 1818
Question, how is something a no-call when someone passes the ball before running through a defender? How does that change things at all? Running through a defender, with or without ball is illegal contact, right?

Yeah, that made no sense. What I think is incorrectly called is when they run through a defender who hasn't been set. In those cases I'd say a no call or a defensive foul, same as if the player had the ball in his hands.
A ref in my rec league once called that, said my screen didn't warrant a call because the guy passed the ball before he ran me over like a freight train.

Well you could have told him, the guy who ran you over actually set an illegal screen, so that warrants a call :P

Re: Celtics (13-13) at Nets (14-12) 12/25
« Reply #44 on: December 25, 2012, 12:29:08 PM »

Online letsgoblue86

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3620
  • Tommy Points: 279
How the hell is Zach Zara allowed to officiate celtics games?