CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsCeltics BasketballCeltics TalkC's see light move KG back to PF
Page: [1] 2 3   
Author Topic: C's see light move KG back to PF  (Read 1525 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Texstyles
Brandon Bass


Tommy Points: 39
Offline Offline

Posts: 359



Email
« on: December 20, 2012, 02:39:40 AM »

Look guys I know it was only Clev. but the starting lineup looked much better tonight.  It was nice seeing KG at PF and floating around everywhere on D.  Now lets just get a real Center and we are all set.
Nothing to see here
kozlodoev
Paul Silas
******

Tommy Points: 378
Offline Offline

Posts: 6527



Email
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2012, 03:21:35 AM »

Look guys I know it was only Clev. but the starting lineup looked much better tonight.  It was nice seeing KG at PF and floating around everywhere on D.  Now lets just get a real Center and we are all set.
What exactly was nice about it? He played great at C. He played great at PF.

The Celtics problem is not Garnett. It's everyone else, pretty much.
Nothing to see here

Managing Rilski Sportist to glory at http://www.buzzerbeater.com
Kiorrik
Global Moderator
Tiny Archibald
*******

Tommy Points: 392
Online Online

Posts: 7155


pɹɐnƃ ʇuıod


WWWEmail
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2012, 06:08:13 AM »

Look guys I know it was only Clev. but the starting lineup looked much better tonight.  It was nice seeing KG at PF and floating around everywhere on D.  Now lets just get a real Center and we are all set.
What exactly was nice about it? He played great at C. He played great at PF.

The Celtics problem is not Garnett. It's everyone else, pretty much.
Perhaps his great play coincided with him getting his legs (knees) back? I dunno, just reaching here.
Nothing to see here

Celtics4ever
Antoine Walker
*****

Tommy Points: 338
Offline Offline

Posts: 5036


Email
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2012, 06:58:44 AM »

I think KG was good at C too.  He was not the problem I am with Koz, on this one.   It was the other guys...
Nothing to see here
crimson_stallion
Kevin Garnett


Tommy Points: 109
Offline Offline

Posts: 835


Email
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2012, 08:01:51 AM »

Look guys I know it was only Clev. but the starting lineup looked much better tonight.  It was nice seeing KG at PF and floating around everywhere on D.  Now lets just get a real Center and we are all set.
What exactly was nice about it? He played great at C. He played great at PF.

The Celtics problem is not Garnett. It's everyone else, pretty much.
Perhaps his great play coincided with him getting his legs (knees) back? I dunno, just reaching here.

What great play?  Didn't he produce about 15 points and 7 rebounds?  He's been averaging that all season long...
Nothing to see here
pearljammer10
Jim Loscutoff
********

Tommy Points: 407
Offline Offline

Posts: 8069



Email
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2012, 08:04:52 AM »

KG plays great at either position. Team has more potential with KG at the 4 and a legit center in the starting line up.
Nothing to see here
Chris
Global Moderator
JoJo White
*****************

Tommy Points: 600
Offline Offline

Posts: 17305



Email
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2012, 09:02:24 AM »

I think this has less to do with moving KG to PF as it does with having someone else who actually plays defense on the court.  If they had a defensive oriented PF, they would have gladly kept KG at center, but clearly Doc was fed up with the softness of the other big men defensively.
Nothing to see here
wdleehi
Forums ViceRoy
Bill Russell
*****************************

Tommy Points: 1070
Online Online

Posts: 29025


Pre-school artwork


Email
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2012, 09:12:12 AM »

What is great about it is it gives the Celtics the flexibility to trade for the best big man available and not worry if he is a C or PF. 
Nothing to see here



Historical Hawks  Coach: Bill Russell
Cowens, Parish, Marques Johnson, Gus Williams, Chambers, Phil Smith, Phil Ford, Paxson, Wedman
Chris
Global Moderator
JoJo White
*****************

Tommy Points: 600
Offline Offline

Posts: 17305



Email
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2012, 09:21:47 AM »

What is great about it is it gives the Celtics the flexibility to trade for the best big man available and not worry if he is a C or PF.

Exactly.  The C's need talent, not position.
Nothing to see here
Snakehead
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 108
Offline Offline

Posts: 2204



Email
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2012, 09:25:27 AM »

Look guys I know it was only Clev. but the starting lineup looked much better tonight.  It was nice seeing KG at PF and floating around everywhere on D.  Now lets just get a real Center and we are all set.
What exactly was nice about it? He played great at C. He played great at PF.

The Celtics problem is not Garnett. It's everyone else, pretty much.

Exactly right.

One of the best players in the league at either position.  And he can exploit C mismatches quite well.  I like him a lot there.

The man is 7' tall.
Nothing to see here
Who
Bob Cousy
**************************

Tommy Points: 1115
Online Online

Posts: 26680


Email
« Reply #10 on: December 20, 2012, 09:37:09 AM »

I think this has less to do with moving KG to PF as it does with having someone else who actually plays defense on the court.  If they had a defensive oriented PF, they would have gladly kept KG at center, but clearly Doc was fed up with the softness of the other big men defensively.

Kenyon Martin!
Nothing to see here

Kansas City - Lenny Wilkens

G - Magic Johnson, Gerald Henderson
G - Andrew Toney, Freddie Brown, Clint Richardson
F - Bernard King, Cedric Maxwell, Bobby Gross
F - Larry Nance, Alvan Adams
C - Jack Sikma, Marvin Webster
Chris
Global Moderator
JoJo White
*****************

Tommy Points: 600
Offline Offline

Posts: 17305



Email
« Reply #11 on: December 20, 2012, 09:39:47 AM »

I think this has less to do with moving KG to PF as it does with having someone else who actually plays defense on the court.  If they had a defensive oriented PF, they would have gladly kept KG at center, but clearly Doc was fed up with the softness of the other big men defensively.

Kenyon Martin!

From 2002!

Seriously, I think Martin would be great if he could still play, I am just not so convinced he still can play.  We already have one washed up defensive specialist.  I am not sure the solution is another one. 
Nothing to see here
mgent
Bailey Howell
****

Tommy Points: 525
Offline Offline

Posts: 4875


Email
« Reply #12 on: December 20, 2012, 09:43:15 AM »

I think this has less to do with moving KG to PF as it does with having someone else who actually plays defense on the court.  If they had a defensive oriented PF, they would have gladly kept KG at center, but clearly Doc was fed up with the softness of the other big men defensively.
True that.  KG is a constant, not the variable.  C, PF, who cares?  We're talking about a guy that played point forward throughout his career.  He can adjust.

Bass is a decent man to man defender and a bad help defender.
Wilcox is an average man to man defender and a bad help defender.
Sullinger is an average (barely) man to man defender and one of the worst help defenders in the league.

And none of them can protect the rim at 6'8" or block a shot, which is coincidentally the only part of defense that KG doesn't do.
Nothing to see here

Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale
Snakehead
Bill Walton
**

Tommy Points: 108
Offline Offline

Posts: 2204



Email
« Reply #13 on: December 20, 2012, 09:48:20 AM »

I think this has less to do with moving KG to PF as it does with having someone else who actually plays defense on the court.  If they had a defensive oriented PF, they would have gladly kept KG at center, but clearly Doc was fed up with the softness of the other big men defensively.

Kenyon Martin!

From 2002!

Seriously, I think Martin would be great if he could still play, I am just not so convinced he still can play.  We already have one washed up defensive specialist.  I am not sure the solution is another one.

I'm not sure if anyone who suggests K Mart saw him play last year.

Awful.




And none of them can protect the rim at 6'8" or block a shot, which is coincidentally the only part of defense that KG doesn't do.

KG doesn't block a lot of shots anymore but he sure as hell protects the rim.
Nothing to see here
Who
Bob Cousy
**************************

Tommy Points: 1115
Online Online

Posts: 26680


Email
« Reply #14 on: December 20, 2012, 09:50:02 AM »

I think this has less to do with moving KG to PF as it does with having someone else who actually plays defense on the court.  If they had a defensive oriented PF, they would have gladly kept KG at center, but clearly Doc was fed up with the softness of the other big men defensively.

Kenyon Martin!

From 2002!

Seriously, I think Martin would be great if he could still play, I am just not so convinced he still can play.  We already have one washed up defensive specialist.  I am not sure the solution is another one.

I'm not sure if anyone who suggests K Mart saw him play last year.

Awful.




And none of them can protect the rim at 6'8" or block a shot, which is coincidentally the only part of defense that KG doesn't do.

KG doesn't block a lot of shots anymore but he sure as hell protects the rim.

Clippers don't win a playoff series last year without Kenyon Martin.
Nothing to see here

Kansas City - Lenny Wilkens

G - Magic Johnson, Gerald Henderson
G - Andrew Toney, Freddie Brown, Clint Richardson
F - Bernard King, Cedric Maxwell, Bobby Gross
F - Larry Nance, Alvan Adams
C - Jack Sikma, Marvin Webster
Pages: [1] 2 3   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines