Barely, according to basketball-reference.com. .164 to KG's .162. That would make them 35th and 37th among players with 200 or more minutes played.
Does that suggest that Wilcox is under-appreciated by some here? Does that suggest that WS/48 is over-rated as a stat by some here? A little from column A and a little from column B?
It's unlikely that he continues to shoot 70% from the field. I suspect it's that number that's inflating his metrics.
His other numbers (particularly rebounding) are not all that impressive, and are in fact below his career averages.
That said, he did have WS/48 around 0.13 for the last two years, so he projects as a good quality option given his role and minutes.
Why? He's not going to be asked to do anything more than what he's doing now. He's almost exclusively a finisher at the rim, and he can reasonably sustain a 70% rate on dunks and layups.
Truthfully I think the team should throw him the ball in the post from time to time. From the few times they've done it, he's displayed nice touch. Not sure if he can pass, though.
I actually really like his overall skillset. He's still very poor on rotations and we need more out of him on the glass, but he's a useful player.