Here is what I don't get. Rajon Rondo 100 percent initiates an altercation that ends up in the stands putting fans, and in one case a little kid in harms way, and it seems there are many on this blog who don't think Rondo deserves a suspension. This thing ended up in the crowd and some people could have really gotten hurt. What am I missing?
Ya, come to think of it - you're 100% right, Vinnie
Old School Basketball maybe?
Clearly two different eras.
I'm not coming at the alter of justice, pleading you to think of the children; I'm just saying based on the actions he took in the modern NBA that a lengthy suspension should be expected.
Well if Bynums near decapitation of a prone and miniscule JJ Barea got him seven games then it should be a lot less than that. Two MAX.
That was on the court. The rules change the minute any kind of alteration gets in among the crowd.
Then that suspension needs to be equal between both players, because it most certainly would not have ended up there if Mr. Kardashian hadn't grabbed Rajon's jersey. And I know if I'm in a fight, a shirt grab is a prerequisite to a punch or being pulled to the ground.
I think the media is blowing this thing out of proportion which will cause the suspension to be heavier. When it happened, suspension didn't even cross my mind. But that's what I get for being raised on 80's Celtics basketball. I think three games is realistic, but still excessive.
I'm really worried about this game.