Author Topic: Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.  (Read 1041 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.
« on: November 21, 2012, 06:50:53 PM »

Offline jdz101

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3171
  • Tommy Points: 404
Some of you may remember the "What would you trade Dooling for??" thread when Keyon was performing terribly mid season last year.

This thread is the same thing except it refers to the man, the beast, the basketball god.....Darko Millicic  ;D



I'll start us off. Instead of Darko the celtics could have bought 244,566 PBJ sandwiches to keep KG happy for his Milwaukee road trips.



how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck was chris bosh?

Re: Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2012, 06:54:02 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
I think Darko could have helped this team if he was fully into the game and was given minutes. If Stiemsma, Perkins, and Semih can be productive here Darko surely can.

Re: Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2012, 07:38:43 PM »

Offline csfansince60s

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6234
  • Tommy Points: 2238
Some of you may remember the "What would you trade Dooling for??" thread when Keyon was performing terribly mid season last year.

This thread is the same thing except it refers to the man, the beast, the basketball god.....Darko Millicic  ;D



I'll start us off. Instead of Darko the celtics could have bought 244,566 PBJ sandwiches to keep KG happy for his Milwaukee road trips.



+1 for the humor:)

When I saw the title, I thought it was one of those coulda, shoulda, woulda threads.

I did think and still do think that Darko was a good signing, though.


Re: Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2012, 08:12:37 PM »

Offline Mazingerz

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1257
  • Tommy Points: 99
3 Porsche GT3
Peavey Bass Player - relearning to play after 10 years sucks;

Re: Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2012, 02:36:23 AM »

Offline jdz101

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3171
  • Tommy Points: 404
50,000 tickets to the Boston aquarium to see the turtles!



how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck was chris bosh?

Re: Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2012, 03:04:44 AM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko

Some of you may remember the "What would you trade Dooling for??" thread when Keyon was performing terribly mid season last year.
The Celtics could have gotten 0.6 2010-2011 Keyon Doolings instead of Darko.

Re: Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.
« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2012, 03:28:08 AM »

Offline jdz101

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3171
  • Tommy Points: 404
Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko

Some of you may remember the "What would you trade Dooling for??" thread when Keyon was performing terribly mid season last year.
The Celtics could have gotten 0.6 2010-2011 Keyon Doolings instead of Darko.

Put your GM hat on and also bring out the chainsaw.

1. Would you trade .6 of a midseason Dooling for Darko?

2. If so, which three fifths of Dooling would you take. The legs or the torso?


how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck was chris bosh?

Re: Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.
« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2012, 03:44:40 AM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko

Some of you may remember the "What would you trade Dooling for??" thread when Keyon was performing terribly mid season last year.
The Celtics could have gotten 0.6 2010-2011 Keyon Doolings instead of Darko.

Put your GM hat on and also bring out the chainsaw.

1. Would you trade .6 of a midseason Dooling for Darko?

2. If so, which three fifths of Dooling would you take. The legs or the torso?
See, this is the good part:

He was bad on the court, but great in the locker room

Take away the legs, and you've got the ultimate glue-guy, still able to sit on the bench and wave a towel, without demanding play-time!

(too soon?)

Re: Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko.
« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2012, 03:59:56 AM »

Offline jdz101

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3171
  • Tommy Points: 404
Things the Celtics could have got instead of Darko

Some of you may remember the "What would you trade Dooling for??" thread when Keyon was performing terribly mid season last year.
The Celtics could have gotten 0.6 2010-2011 Keyon Doolings instead of Darko.

Put your GM hat on and also bring out the chainsaw.

1. Would you trade .6 of a midseason Dooling for Darko?

2. If so, which three fifths of Dooling would you take. The legs or the torso?
See, this is the good part:

He was bad on the court, but great in the locker room

Take away the legs, and you've got the ultimate glue-guy, still able to sit on the bench and wave a towel, without demanding play-time!

(too soon?)

I reckon our team could really do with a keyon torso in the locker room at the moment to be honest...


how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck was chris bosh?