CelticsBlog: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.

CelticsBlog ForumsOther DiscussionsOff TopicCurrent EventsUS to become largest oil producer by 2017?
Page: [1]   
Author Topic: US to become largest oil producer by 2017?  (Read 543 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Cman
Don Nelson
*********

Tommy Points: 201
Offline Offline

Posts: 9846



Email
« on: November 12, 2012, 12:57:18 PM »

I saw an article today on yahoo finance on this topic, which draws heavily from a recent report by the International Energy Assoc.

Quote
A new report by the International Energy Association says the U.S. will become the world's largest oil producer by 2017, overtaking current leaders Saudi Arabia and Russia. U.S. energy policies initiated by the George W. Bush administration and implemented by President Barack Obama have moved the U.S. toward energy independence and away from Middle East energy sources. U.S. oil production has risen rapidly since 2008 and oil imports are at their lowest level in two decades.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/u-pass-saudi-arabia-energy-production-iea-says-170907660.html

Thoughts?
Nothing to see here

Celtics fan for life.
Rondo2287
Satch Sanders
***********

Tommy Points: 485
Offline Offline

Posts: 11149


Historical Draft Best Overall/Best Defensive team


Email
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2012, 01:15:14 PM »

I saw an article today on yahoo finance on this topic, which draws heavily from a recent report by the International Energy Assoc.

Quote
A new report by the International Energy Association says the U.S. will become the world's largest oil producer by 2017, overtaking current leaders Saudi Arabia and Russia. U.S. energy policies initiated by the George W. Bush administration and implemented by President Barack Obama have moved the U.S. toward energy independence and away from Middle East energy sources. U.S. oil production has risen rapidly since 2008 and oil imports are at their lowest level in two decades.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/u-pass-saudi-arabia-energy-production-iea-says-170907660.html

Thoughts?

Im good with it if it lowers our out of pocket costs for gas.   developing a legitimate alternative to the middle east for these resources should be benneficial for everyone. 

except for the Middle East of course
Nothing to see here

CB Historical Draft

Elvin Hayes, Tiny Archibald, Truck Robinson, Bobby Jones, 5.11, 6.2, 7.11, 8.2, 9.11, 10.2, 11.11, 12.2
Kwhit10
Bailey Howell
****

Tommy Points: 900
Offline Offline

Posts: 4104



Email
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2012, 01:35:23 PM »

I saw an article today on yahoo finance on this topic, which draws heavily from a recent report by the International Energy Assoc.

Quote
A new report by the International Energy Association says the U.S. will become the world's largest oil producer by 2017, overtaking current leaders Saudi Arabia and Russia. U.S. energy policies initiated by the George W. Bush administration and implemented by President Barack Obama have moved the U.S. toward energy independence and away from Middle East energy sources. U.S. oil production has risen rapidly since 2008 and oil imports are at their lowest level in two decades.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/u-pass-saudi-arabia-energy-production-iea-says-170907660.html

Thoughts?

Im good with it if it lowers our out of pocket costs for gas.   developing a legitimate alternative to the middle east for these resources should be benneficial for everyone. 

except for the Middle East of course

They'll be fine since by then China will be consuming more than we do now.
Nothing to see here
pearljammer10
Jim Loscutoff
********

Tommy Points: 407
Offline Offline

Posts: 8083



Email
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2012, 01:43:26 PM »

Lower has prices? Then sure I'm ok. But what about the alternative sources of clean, green, and efficient energy we've been promised.
Nothing to see here
LooseCannon
Antoine Walker
*****

Tommy Points: 381
Online Online

Posts: 5287



Email
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2012, 02:16:41 PM »

Im good with it if it lowers our out of pocket costs for gas.

How do you feel about it if it doesn't lower those costs?
Nothing to see here

"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference
Rondo2287
Satch Sanders
***********

Tommy Points: 485
Offline Offline

Posts: 11149


Historical Draft Best Overall/Best Defensive team


Email
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2012, 02:18:24 PM »

Im good with it if it lowers our out of pocket costs for gas.

How do you feel about it if it doesn't lower those costs?

Then what the heck is the point of stripping our country of its natural resources.  I guess i either want it to lower our costs from the pump or have oil companies pay more in taxes to help bring down the deficit.  If it does neither of those things I would rather pillage the middle east for their supplies first and then start harvesting our own. 
Nothing to see here

CB Historical Draft

Elvin Hayes, Tiny Archibald, Truck Robinson, Bobby Jones, 5.11, 6.2, 7.11, 8.2, 9.11, 10.2, 11.11, 12.2
blake
Kevin Garnett


Tommy Points: 108
Offline Offline

Posts: 758



Email
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2012, 04:12:19 PM »

Quote
Then what the heck is the point of stripping our country of its natural resources.  I guess i either want it to lower our costs from the pump or have oil companies pay more in taxes to help bring down the deficit.  If it does neither of those things I would rather pillage the middle east for their supplies first and then start harvesting our own.

Removing our energy dependence from the Middle East would be huge.  Strange that we keep refusing to do it through any other means than oil, but at least it is a start.
Nothing to see here
Pages: [1]   


User Tools

Welcome Guest

Welcome to the CelticsBlog Forums.
SMF 2.0.2 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines