|
Fafnir
|
 |
« Reply #810 on: February 05, 2013, 11:56:39 PM » |
|
Kobe blowing by Gerald Wallace with ease. Lousy defense.
That Wallace contract looks like the worst of the off-season right now.
Man to think that supposedly they potentially could have had Pierce instead on his current contract...
No kidding. Nets would be a legit contender in the East, Celtics would have Drummond, Barnes, or whatever Ainge got for trading Rondo after drafting Lillard.
At least Jeff Green is clearly not the worst contract of the off-season anymore, though!
Why do you think Ainge would have traded Rondo for another draft pick? I don't see what any of the other teams in the top 10 would have traded for Rondo necessarily. I think he'd have taken either Drummond or Barnes instead. |
|
|
|
|
 Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Who
|
|
« Reply #811 on: February 06, 2013, 08:36:22 PM » |
|
"One of the issues that I have is that neither Darrell or Ed (Davis) are fives. We don't have another big guy. We weren't able to play big and have two bigger people across the board because we don't have a bigger guy to put in the game."
In other words, Hollins no longer had Mo Speights or Hamed Haddadi because they were traded away. Did Hollins mean it as a shot?
It almost doesn't matter, honestly. When the head coach spends part of his press conference lamenting what he no longer has on his roster, that's not a good sign. http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2013/feb/06/griz-grinding-to-a-halt/ |
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
Kansas City - 7.4, 8.9, 9.4, 10.9, 11.4, 12.9
G - Magic Johnson
G - Andrew Toney
F - Bernard King
F - Larry Nance, Cedric Maxwell
C - Jack Sikma
|
|
|
|
Who
|
|
« Reply #812 on: February 06, 2013, 09:29:55 PM » |
|
Chris Andersen moving well on defense again. Showing good quickness and mobility.
I have no idea why Danny Ainge didn't think this guy couldn't help the Celtics.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
Kansas City - 7.4, 8.9, 9.4, 10.9, 11.4, 12.9
G - Magic Johnson
G - Andrew Toney
F - Bernard King
F - Larry Nance, Cedric Maxwell
C - Jack Sikma
|
|
|
PhoSita
Paul Pierce 
Tommy Points: 101
 OfflinePosts: 1575
|
|
« Reply #813 on: February 06, 2013, 09:45:22 PM » |
|
Kobe blowing by Gerald Wallace with ease. Lousy defense.
That Wallace contract looks like the worst of the off-season right now.
Man to think that supposedly they potentially could have had Pierce instead on his current contract...
No kidding. Nets would be a legit contender in the East, Celtics would have Drummond, Barnes, or whatever Ainge got for trading Rondo after drafting Lillard.
At least Jeff Green is clearly not the worst contract of the off-season anymore, though!
Why do you think Ainge would have traded Rondo for another draft pick? I don't see what any of the other teams in the top 10 would have traded for Rondo necessarily.
I think he'd have taken either Drummond or Barnes instead.
Sorry, I guess I constructed my sentence badly. What I meant is that we'd have had the #6 pick, with which I assume Ainge would have selected Barnes, Drummond, or perhaps Lillard. If he had selected Lillard, I'm hypothesizing that perhaps he would have traded Rondo for some other piece. I don't know what that could have been. Obviously not worthwhile spending too much time thinking about it in any case. Based on what we heard around the draft last summer, though, I'm pretty sure Ainge would have taken Barnes. |
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
CelticConcourse
|
|
« Reply #814 on: February 06, 2013, 09:46:45 PM » |
|
Kobe blowing by Gerald Wallace with ease. Lousy defense.
That Wallace contract looks like the worst of the off-season right now.
Man to think that supposedly they potentially could have had Pierce instead on his current contract...
No kidding. Nets would be a legit contender in the East, Celtics would have Drummond, Barnes, or whatever Ainge got for trading Rondo after drafting Lillard.
At least Jeff Green is clearly not the worst contract of the off-season anymore, though!
Why do you think Ainge would have traded Rondo for another draft pick? I don't see what any of the other teams in the top 10 would have traded for Rondo necessarily.
I think he'd have taken either Drummond or Barnes instead.
Sorry, I guess I constructed my sentence badly.
What I meant is that we'd have had the #6 pick, with which I assume Ainge would have selected Barnes, Drummond, or perhaps Lillard.
If he had selected Lillard, I'm hypothesizing that perhaps he would have traded Rondo for some other piece. I don't know what that could have been. Obviously not worthwhile spending too much time thinking about it in any case.
Ainge doesn't pick from small schools much... I doubt he would have picked Lillz |
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Edgar
|
|
« Reply #815 on: February 07, 2013, 10:43:25 PM » |
|
Just in case you missed it
with Milwakee yesterday
We are no.7... right?
yay
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
BASS_THUMPER
|
|
« Reply #816 on: February 07, 2013, 10:44:06 PM » |
|
Just in case you missed it
Milwakee Lose tonight
We are no.7
yay
celebrate! give me a shot of that rum brotha |
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Fafnir
|
|
« Reply #817 on: February 07, 2013, 10:44:48 PM » |
|
It'll be interesting to see how Chicago's D holds up in Denver.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Edgar
|
|
« Reply #818 on: February 07, 2013, 10:47:26 PM » |
|
Just in case you missed it
Milwakee Lose tonight
We are no.7
yay
celebrate!
give me a shot of that rum brotha
sippin... even when the lost was yesterday lol |
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
CelticConcourse
|
|
« Reply #819 on: February 07, 2013, 10:48:28 PM » |
|
It'll be interesting to see how Chicago's D holds up in Denver.
It will not! |
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
azzenfrost
Rajon Rondo
Tommy Points: 71
OfflinePosts: 600
|
|
« Reply #820 on: February 07, 2013, 10:49:19 PM » |
|
Watching the Nuggets right now since we're playing them next.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
I moved the cheese.
|
|
|
|
Fafnir
|
|
« Reply #821 on: February 07, 2013, 10:49:37 PM » |
|
Rare chance for me to watch Denver, since stupid NBA league pass thinks I'm in Denver's home market for some reason.....
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Edgar
|
|
« Reply #822 on: February 07, 2013, 10:50:11 PM » |
|
It'll be interesting to see how Chicago's D holds up in Denver.
theyre not doing bad Even when i like them to lose tonight Denver is overachieving in my humble oppinion |
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Fafnir
|
|
« Reply #823 on: February 07, 2013, 10:56:36 PM » |
|
It'll be interesting to see how Chicago's D holds up in Denver.
theyre not doing bad
Even when i like them to lose tonight
Denver is overachieving in my humble oppinion
Yeah so far its been more Chicago's type of game. Going small might spark the Nuggets here though. |
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Fafnir
|
|
« Reply #824 on: February 07, 2013, 11:00:46 PM » |
|
And Chicago clearly isn't comfortable going small against the Nuggets.
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
|
Around the League
