Author Topic: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?  (Read 19701 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« on: March 21, 2012, 04:36:32 AM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
Girl is huge, she had a dunk in the sweet 16 as Baylor destroyed Florida. Would you watch Griner if she flourished in the WNBA?

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2012, 05:25:02 AM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
i've known about him for years.  Definitely a big future in WNBA.

Reminds me of a more masculine version of Gerald Green:

The interviews still get me.  Karl Malone-esque.  Skip to 1:31... just saying

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flPpzHtxZN8

Honestly I'm interested to see what happens when Griner enters the WNBA.  It seems like just yesterday that Griner's high school dunk videos were all the rage on youtube... and people were speculating it was Shaun Livingston's older brother:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WdumGR5-JM
« Last Edit: March 21, 2012, 05:44:38 AM by LarBrd33 »

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2012, 06:31:20 AM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
Quote
The uploader has not made this video available in your country.
Really. What's with the attitude towards everything "not USA" all the time? Seriously? WHY would you do that? WHY would you set it exclusively to US? What's the point? What are you trying to achieve? It's STUPID. There are TONS of reasons to actually share with the world, and it doesn't cost extra or anything. Heck, I bet it costs extra effort to set it to "US only".

Ridiculous.

/Rant.

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2012, 07:02:26 AM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
LarBrd33:

Seriously?

She's going to dominate the WNBA.

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2012, 09:11:46 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
LarBrd33:

Seriously?

She's going to dominate the WNBA.
I bet he will.

Ok, Ok... I'll shut up.  Griner will be rich soon enough so I can't really feel all that bad.

You know, honestly... the comments are unavoidable when you look and sound like that... and clearly are physically different than your female peers.  I do apologize to the many hermaphrodites on this forum who may be offended by the comments.  Get use to them, though... because the more famous Griner gets, the louder the comments will become.  A National title, fame and fortune in the pros will all just fuel the controversy.  I'm telling you that you WILL be hearing more of it.

Here's the thing.  If Griner was born a hermaphrodite, it is perfectly within the rights of her family to choose what sex they want to distinguish her.  It's a private thing.  It's nobody's business.  Jamie Lee Curtis has been dogged by these rumors for years.  Frankly it can not and will not be proven either way.  It's her business.  In many cases the person doesn't even know the truth themselves, because they undergo surgery as children and their parents keep it from them to avoid embarrassment or feeling "different".  It doesn't become a problem until other athletes start claiming the male characteristics provide an unfair advantage.  Look up Caster Semenya....



"She's" the African middle distance runner who won gold in the World Championships.  Following her victory there was a huge controversy over her gender and she was subject to gender testing. 

Quote
Following her victory at the world championships, questions were raised about her gender.[2][13][19][20]

The IAAF's handling of the case spurred many negative reactions. A number of athletes, including retired sprinter Michael Johnson, criticized the organization for its response to the incident.[16][21] Prominent South African civic leaders, commentators, politicians, and activists characterized the controversy as racist, as well as an affront to Semenya's privacy and human rights.[22][23] The IAAF said it only made the test public after it had already been reported in the media, denying charges of racism and expressing regret about "the allegations being made about the reasons for which these tests are being conducted."[15][24] The federation also explained that the motivation for the test was not suspected cheating but a desire to determine whether she had a "rare medical condition" giving her an unfair competitive advantage.[25] The president of the IAAF stated that the case could have been handled with more sensitivity.[26] In an interview with South African magazine YOU Semenya stated, "God made me the way I am and I accept myself." She also took part in a makeover with the magazine.[27]

On 7 September 2009, Wilfred Daniels, Semenya's coach with Athletics South Africa (ASA), resigned because he felt that ASA "did not advise Ms. Semenya properly". He apologized for personally having failed to protect her.[28] Athletics South Africa President Leonard Chuene admitted on 19 September 2009 to having subjected Semenya to gender tests. He had previously lied to Semenya about the purpose of the tests and to others about having performed the tests.

The test results supposedly leaked out (I say supposedly, because apparently they were never made public due to the controversy and sensitivity... she was never stripped of her gold) and the leaked results showed she had no ovaries or womb and had more than 3 times the amount of testosterone as a normal female... being produced by internal male testes.  In other words she was "intersex"


Quote
This condition, known as intersex, is commonly referred to as hermaphroditism. (Some support groups say that the term "hermaphroditism" can be inaccurate and offensive, as it implies that someone is both fully male and fully female, which is a physiologic impossibility.)

According to the Intersex Society of North America, (ISNA) intersex is a "general term used for a variety of conditions in which a person is born with a reproductive or sexual anatomy that doesn't seem to fit the typical definitions of female or male."

"For example, a person might be born appearing to be female on the outside, but having mostly male-typical anatomy on the inside," a statement on the society's Web site says.
Vital Signs
Each month CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta brings viewers health stories from around the world.
See more from the show »

There are around 20 to 30 types of biological "intersex" conditions, each of them affecting the body in different ways.

Some people are born with both male and female reproductive organs, while others like intersex activist Hida Viloria are born biologically female yet possess masculine-looking genitalia.

Others have a form known as Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS) where the person is totally insensitive to any male hormones known as androgens.

FIrst of all, her results were never made "official", but they were reported throughout the media back in 2009 before the whole thing was buried.  Questions about Caster's privacy and the testing methods all were raised.  Personally I see no reason to NOT believe that Caster has intersex characteristics. Think about this for a second.  The number of babies born with atypical male/female bodies is 1-100.  "If you ask experts at medical centers how often a child is born so noticeably atypical in terms of genitalia that a specialist in sex differentiation is called in, the number comes out to about 1 in 1500 to 1 in 2000 births. But a lot more people than that are born with subtler forms of sex anatomy variations, some of which won’t show up until later in life."  http://www.isna.org/faq/frequency

So think about this for a second.  In a world with 7 billion people... even if 1 in 10,000 "females" were born with male characteristics (testosterone, internal male testes, etc) doesn't it stand to reason that these "females" would have a better chance of excelling in "female" sports due to their physical characteristics?  Is it really all that unbelievable that a "female" like Caster is dominating her female competition and happens to be someone with these unique characteristics?   No... not unbelievable at all.  It's like saying it's "unbelievable" that a guy with a pituitary disorder (that causes you to continue growing) would end up in the NBA.   Clearly that's not unbelievable... Gheorghe Mureșan had an extremely rare medical condition that caused him to grow to 7'7...  7'7 people have an advantage in the NBA.  It's not unbelievable it's actually completely understandable.  I know several other international players have "gigantism"... Pavel Podkolzine is another NBA player off the top of my head who suffered from the same pituitary disorder.  Once again it's not surprising at all that professional wrestlers Andre the Giant and "The Big Show" both had the same pituitary disorder.  Nothing shocking or surprising about it.

It's not surprising that multiple people born with dwarfism end up in show business.  It's not surprising that multiple people born with gigantism end up playing professional basketball or end up as professional wrestlers...   and it's not surprising that folks born with intersex characteristics (who choose to be designated as female) would have an advantage in female-only sports. 

I don't think it's outlandish, rude, insensitive or classless to point out that Brittney Griner has very male characteristics.  Honestly I think it's somewhat ignorant and naive to ignore them.  I personally don't give a crap if Griner is allowed to dominate women's basketball and continue to go on as a woman.  Personally, in this uber-sensitive wha-wha offended society, I don't give a crap if Chauncey Billups decides to have a sex change and joins the WNBA.  I think they should let her in.  I happen to be friends with a proud transsexual post-op stand-up comedian in Seattle and we all refer to him as "her"... if she wants to join the WNBA, so be it.  But lets call a spade a spade here.  Something is very likely up with Griner.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2012, 09:21:07 PM by LarBrd33 »

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2012, 09:53:43 PM »

Offline fairweatherfan

  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20738
  • Tommy Points: 2365
  • Be the posts you wish to see in the world.
I'm more excited (very, very relative term w/r/t the WNBA) about Elena Delle Donne.  Watched her play Tuesday - wife is from Delaware and wanted to check out the team.  Game reminded me a little of Dirk (again, relatively speaking).  Sweet release, very good footwork, can score in the post and all the way out to the 3.  Hoping she does well in the pros later on.

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2012, 10:01:48 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
At this point, she might be Ainge's best option for our back up big man.

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2012, 10:07:31 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8509
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
Nothing can save the WNBA.

Why? its a lesser product then the NBA.

As long as I know Nate Robinson could dominate that league, there isn't much you can do to get me to watch it.



Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2012, 10:12:07 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 58711
  • Tommy Points: -25629
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I don't think so.  I don't think the vast majority of the sports viewing public has any interest in the WNBA, regardless of whether it has one athlete who can occasionally dunk.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2012, 10:12:43 PM »

Offline mqtcelticsfan

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2314
  • Tommy Points: 236
I would have to say absolutely not. There's no way Griner is that much better than any of the other great female basketball players we've seen recently.

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2012, 10:45:37 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8509
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
Yowza with bass in that voice and the other masculine features it does make you wonder

Also Candice Parker couldn't do it and she's a better player.

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2012, 11:42:52 PM »

Offline syfy9

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1873
  • Tommy Points: 291
  • We may as well put Tyrion in at center.
At this point, she might be Ainge's best option for our back up big man.
LOL SO TRUE!!! TP!!!
I like Marcus Smart

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2012, 11:16:03 AM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
So, LarBrd33 - with all THAT said - and you said a lot - would you still believe that "Something is very likely up with Griner"....if she was your daughter?

What about Caster?

When I was younger, I had all sorts of questions and observations about things. My folks taught me to not be ignorant or naive about them, BUT: At the same time not draw any conclusions, or even try to.

I'm sure that NO ONE here knows Brittney Griner or Caster. Or their parents.

I wonder what their parents think about them?

I'd love to meet and shake the hands either of these women - especially Brittney. She will be hard to come by once she starts dominating at the next level.

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2012, 11:37:05 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42583
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
The thing about questions regarding Griner is that as Larbrd said, the more popular she becomes to more questions will be asked. The more questions that are asked, the more she, and the WNBA as a whole, will have to address them, and the more they address them the more validity is given to open speculation about a very private matter.

Like Larbrd said, it happens. Sometimes, kids are born with a disorder and the parents make the decision long before the child could have any kind of significant input on the subject. A lot of times too, like Lrdbrd said, the kids don't even know any better, unless the surgery or condition has later affects that need to be addressed.

Putting Griner aside for a moment, in a league where the supposition going in is that women are physically by nature weaker, smaller, and slower than men, making sure that the sex of all participants is indeed female should be a priority of the wnba.

However, knowing whether or not Britney Griner or any other athlete was born a hermaphrodite or any thing other than a traditional woman is not and should not be a priority to fans to speculate on.

Its an interesting comparison. I'd have no issues if the wnba routinely screened all women for this stuff pre-draft, to ensure the integrity of their own league, but I have a big problem with Joe Schmoe coming up with a conspiracy theory about how Britney Griner is not actually a woman cuz she's huge and has a deep voice and sounds like Karl Malone during interviews...cuz it just doesn't seem proper.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: Could Brittney Griner be the WNBA's savior?
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2012, 11:53:13 AM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Quote
The uploader has not made this video available in your country.
Really. What's with the attitude towards everything "not USA" all the time? Seriously? WHY would you do that? WHY would you set it exclusively to US? What's the point? What are you trying to achieve? It's STUPID. There are TONS of reasons to actually share with the world, and it doesn't cost extra or anything. Heck, I bet it costs extra effort to set it to "US only".

Ridiculous.

/Rant.

   Haha. Sometimes I'll be searching for a fairly obscure song and find it on amazon.uk, only to find out that I can't *purchase* it because of my geographical location (in the US). Not really sure of the logic behind that one.