The players should not accept any deal below 53/54%.
I don't think they'll agree to a deal below that threshold over the next few days, and even if they were to agree to such a deal, I don't see it passing a union-wide vote.
Well, I agree that the players should not accept anything less than a fair deal. I even agree 53% is probably a fair deal for both sides. But, the problem is that number is one the owners just will never agree to.
The way I see it is, the players were getting 57% and the owners intially offered 46%, so, split the difference and you get 51.5%. Additionally, the owners are now rumored to be offering 49%, and the players had previously offered 53%. Again, split that and you get 51%.
The offer the owners have (rumored) to make is basically 51%, although it appears it is based on certain revenue triggers being met. Take out the triggers, and just make it a straight 51% garuantee, and I bet we'd have a deal.