Author Topic: JaJuan Johnson  (Read 1854 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JaJuan Johnson
« on: April 01, 2011, 10:30:29 AM »

Offline CFAN38

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Tommy Points: 420
he is currently projected as a late 1st early 2nd round player, though this might change if alot of underclassman dont come out do to labor issues.

If he is around in the late first he would make a nice pick up for the Cs.

He has good length for the pf reported to have a 7'2 wing spand and around 6'10. He needs to add more weight but put up good numbers in college and looks like a good running 4.

He could potentially be a nice fit running the floor with rondo and green in the future.
Mavs
Wiz
Hornet

Re: JaJuan Johnson
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2011, 10:35:09 AM »

Offline OsirusCeltics

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2013
  • Tommy Points: 198
Don't really know about him, but I found this video of his game

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBZukuSo020

The PA announcer's really annoying though

Re: JaJuan Johnson
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2011, 10:56:17 AM »

Offline Cman

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13068
  • Tommy Points: 120
I know nothing about him, but was intrigued by that video.
(of course, the pet peeve is that all such videos only include offensive highlights, never defensive highlights).
Celtics fan for life.

Re: JaJuan Johnson
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2011, 07:21:07 PM »

Offline LosAngelesCeltic

  • Jaden Springer
  • Posts: 6
  • Tommy Points: 2
He would be great and very possibly be availiable at28.

Re: JaJuan Johnson
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2011, 07:28:16 PM »

Online celticinorlando

  • John Havlicek
  • ****************************
  • Posts: 28041
  • Tommy Points: 638
  • MASTER OF PANIC
I am an Ohio State alum so I have seen him a ton. He likes to shoot jumpers than play inside. he is going to add a ton of weight.

Re: JaJuan Johnson
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2011, 11:27:44 PM »

Offline dtrader

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 730
  • Tommy Points: 42
People really need to put more thought into naming their kids smh