Author Topic: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1  (Read 84885 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #75 on: April 01, 2011, 08:41:47 PM »

Offline birdwatcher

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1385
  • Tommy Points: 126
  • Another undersized Celtic...
I love what JO did. That has been missing.
I don't mind it either. Stupid yes--but it didn't cost us a point, it was a double tech--and if you're getting labeled as soft, someone has to step up and do the dirty work.

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #76 on: April 01, 2011, 08:41:53 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Has anyone seen Ray Allen  ???

He seems to no longer be part of the offense

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #77 on: April 01, 2011, 08:42:40 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 58754
  • Tommy Points: -25628
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Gotta agree with Doc and Cowens.  Keep your composure, and take the free points.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #78 on: April 01, 2011, 08:43:29 PM »

Offline birdwatcher

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1385
  • Tommy Points: 126
  • Another undersized Celtic...
Has anyone seen Ray Allen  ???

He seems to no longer be part of the offense
He also stopped moving without the ball. He used to be very active...

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #79 on: April 01, 2011, 08:43:39 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 58754
  • Tommy Points: -25628
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
I love what JO did. That has been missing.
I don't mind it either. Stupid yes--but it didn't cost us a point, it was a double tech--and if you're getting labeled as soft, someone has to step up and do the dirty work.

Well, no.  The refs called a tech on Zaza.  Then, afterward, JO re-inserted himself into the conflict, and got the tech, off-setting it.  In other words, it cost us a (potential) point.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #80 on: April 01, 2011, 08:43:48 PM »

Offline Cman

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13068
  • Tommy Points: 120
The refs have been swallowing their whistles for the most part, which I like.
Celtics fan for life.

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #81 on: April 01, 2011, 08:43:50 PM »

Offline barefacedmonk

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7221
  • Tommy Points: 1796
  • The Dude Abides
Nice block by D-West...too bad he couldn't convert.
"An ounce of practice is worth more than tons of preaching." - M.K. Gandhi


Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #82 on: April 01, 2011, 08:44:12 PM »

Offline jimmehx

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1257
  • Tommy Points: 166
Delonte is showing his skills and I absolutely love it. He looks phenomenal tonight!


"Uhhh... Wife makes chicken..." - Brian Scalabrine 2007.

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #83 on: April 01, 2011, 08:44:54 PM »

Offline j804

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9188
  • Tommy Points: 3060
  • BLOOD SWEAT & TEARS
as expected, the hawks are getting what they want inside

Yeah, Krstic isn't a good defender, but he's more intimidating in the paint than Baby is.
LOL now Krstic is gone we want him back, for his Defense and being intimidating? All what he has been crucified for NOT being

Well, I'd rather have a 7-footer in the paint than a 6'7" Baby, even if Krstic plays softer than I'd like.  He's not a good defender, but at least he has length.
true it just sounded funny

Btw didn't see nothing wrong with what JO did we need that we have gone soft.
"7ft PG. Rondo leaves and GUESS WHAT? We got a BIGGER point guard!"-Tommy on Olynyk


Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #84 on: April 01, 2011, 08:45:15 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 58754
  • Tommy Points: -25628
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
This one has definitely been an entertaining game, and the Celts have come out with some pretty good energy for a road back-to-back.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #85 on: April 01, 2011, 08:45:53 PM »

Offline barefacedmonk

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7221
  • Tommy Points: 1796
  • The Dude Abides
This one has definitely been an entertaining game, and the Celts have come out with some pretty good energy for a road back-to-back.

The Captain's pep talk worked, I guess. :)
"An ounce of practice is worth more than tons of preaching." - M.K. Gandhi


Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #86 on: April 01, 2011, 08:46:29 PM »

Offline Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 58754
  • Tommy Points: -25628
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
Quote
Btw didn't see nothing wrong with what JO did we need that we have gone soft.

There are ways to show that you're not soft without giving away points, aren't there?  I prefer giving hard fouls, as opposed to shoving guys after the whistle.


I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER——— AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!@ 34 minutes

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #87 on: April 01, 2011, 08:46:42 PM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
LOL!!!!

Baby!!!!

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #88 on: April 01, 2011, 08:46:46 PM »

Offline birdwatcher

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1385
  • Tommy Points: 126
  • Another undersized Celtic...
That's just wrong, Baby.

Re: Celtics (52-22) at Hawks (43-32) 4/1
« Reply #89 on: April 01, 2011, 08:46:49 PM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11587
  • Tommy Points: 872
  • GOT IT!!!
hahaha

I guess Baby hit his three for the year.