And I would still take Pondexter or James over Babbitt any day. I see bust written all over the guy.
Why? Do better basketball skills and athleticism mean anything to you?
The facts are...
1. Babbitt recorded a higher max vertical than Pondexter and James
2. Babbitt tested more athletic than Pondexter and James.
3. Babbitt tested more mobile than Pondexter and James.
4. Babbitt tested stronger than Pondexter and James.
5. Babbitt measured taller than Pondexter and James.
6. babbitt is a better shooter/scorer than Pondexter and James.
7. Babbitt is a better mid-range shooter than Pondexter and James.
8. Babbitt is a better 3-point shooter than Pondexter and James.
9. Babbitt is a better face the basket player than Pondexter and James.
10. Babbitt is a better back to the basket player than Pondexter and James.
11. Babbitt has better post up moves than Pondexter and James.
12. Babbitt is a better ball handler than Pondexter and James.
13. Babbitt is a better free throw shooter than Pondexter and
James.
14. Babbitt is better creating his own shot than Pondexter and James.
15. Babbitt is better creating for teammates than Pondexter and James.
16. Babbitt is a better passer than Pondexter and James.
Those are just some of the facts.
Babbitt will be drafted ahead of Pondexter and James, because Babbitt has the better basketball skills and is the better athlete overall.
The closest NBA comparison to Luke Babbitt is probably Paul Pierce. SF who does it all: post up, face up, drive, mid-range, shoot the 3, handles, passes, deceptively quick, athletic, good body strength, high bball IQ. Babbitt's a better leaper than Pierce, though.
As a sophmore, the 6-9 218 SF averaged:
21.9 ppg. 8.9 rpg. 2.1 apg. 1.0 spg. 50% fg. 91.7% ft. 41.6% 3fg.