Al Jefferson, 15, good pick. Not a franchise guy/all star yet, but a good player, and potential future all star. Seems appropriate for draft position.
Rajon Rondo, 21, good value here, even if he's still working on that 15 foot wide open jumper (sarcasm there-but there is some truth to it, and it's why he fell to 21. He probably looks better/developed better because of such good shooters elsewhere on the floor)
Perkins, 27, good role player. Keep in mind that the Perk we see today is much different than the fat 6'10" kid that Danny drafted. It took him years to develop into a competent role player, and more to start on a contender.
I think your agenda's showing through. A 20/10 guy is "appropriate" for the 15th pick? Rondo looks better because of the other players on the floor? Perk's drafted at the appropriate spot, and Rondo maybe slightly above his draft position? Last season, before Rondo was a double-double machine, I saw a list that had him rated the best #21 pick ever.
Try something a little more objective. Look over the last 20 nba drafts. Figure out how many 15 picks are better than Al, how many 21s are better than Rondo and how many 27s are better than Perk. Go back 25 years if you have to. If you can't come up with a decent sized list of #15 picks better than Al and #27 picks better than Perk and at least 3-4 #21 picks better than Rondo in that time frame then you need to rethink your position.
"Agenda"
I'm making an argument that Doc is average at the draft, if that's what you mean. I hope it is.
Let's be objective.
Objectively, I think it's important to consider all-around play. Flawed players are not franchise players, but are often very very good players, starters. And combinations on the floor matter, since they diminish the impact of the flaws, while emphasizing the strengths.
Examples: Rondo is a great passer, but a terrible shooter. He's on the floor with 3 good (KG) to great (RA,PP) shooters, and one good finisher in Perk. His strenghs show, his flaw is minimized. He wouldn't be an allstar playing in Minnesota, I'm pretty sure.
Big Al surely is 20/10 (but always on a losing team), a poor defender, poor post passer, and cannot assure a bucket in the clutch.
Look, I still like MOST of the guys Danny drafted. I would be happy to start a "bring back Brandon Hunter" thread, even, if not for the risks of starting any "bring back" thread.
Those that fell, even the good ones, fell for a reason. Danny didn't work any draft miracles anywhere; as the OP said, Rondo is the only one clearly better than his draft position, yet we can't put him in the top 10 without a jumper.