Author Topic: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division  (Read 92752 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #105 on: August 10, 2009, 09:44:53 AM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
I know that most teams in the league dont have players that have played together before I guess my main issue was how you think it will work with players forming chemistry for those first 10 games then having Rahard thrown back into the mix.  Otherwise a solid answer!  This was definitly not the news any GM wants to receive during this excersize so im definitly not jealous of your position!
CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #106 on: August 10, 2009, 09:44:57 AM »

Online celticinorlando

  • John Havlicek
  • ****************************
  • Posts: 28546
  • Tommy Points: 662
  • MASTER OF PANIC


STARTING FIVE

PG JAMEER NELSON:


2008-09 STATS: PPG: 16.7, APG 5.4, RPG 4.1, 47% FG, 42% 3PT FG

WHO HE IS:    6 ft 0 in (1.83 m) Weight   190 lb (86 kg)

What he does: In 2008-09, Nelson had his best season as pro. He was elected to the All-Star team despite being hurt in game 42. He did return for the NBA Finals vs. the Los Angeles Lakers. Despite his size, Nelson is more of a half-court player than a transition guy, preferring to use pick-and-roll plays to set up drives going right or pull-up jumpers. He's also a good 3-point shooter who can hit off the dribble when opponents go under the screen. However, he has a scorer's mentality and despite last year's assist jump his decision. Defensively, he does have a tough time matching up bigger PGs, but has shown the toughness to give up his body, drawing 27 offensive fouls in 2007-2008 season.

SG John Salmons


2008-09 STATS: PPG 18.3 APG 3.2 RPG 4.2 47% FG 42% 3PT FG

WHO HE IS: 6-6, 207

What he does: In addition to his slashing ability, Salmons is a very good defender who can guard three positions. He's quick and has good size at 6-7, and ranked in the top third of shooting guards in both blocks and steals per minute. He was often used as the primary stopper against elite scorers and he held his own in those matchups.

Offensively, he likes to attack off the dribble for layups or short-range jumpers. He's a mediocre spot-up shooter and isn't a good shooter off the dribble, plus he tends to have high turnover rates because he's driving into traffic so much. However, he's a good enough dribbler to play point guard in a pinch.

SF RICHARD JEFFERSON


2008-09 STATS: PPG 19.6, APG 2.4, RPG 4.6, 44 % FG, 38 % 3PT

WHO HE IS: 6-7, 225

What he does: Jefferson is an explosive driver, especially going to his right from the right side, and is among the best in the league at running the floor -- again, virtually always on the right side. The change is that he now has become a good enough midrange jump shooter that teams have to respect his shot.

He's not a great ball-handler and will make bad decisions and/or take poor shots when he's put into positions to create; as a result, he's much better used finishing what other players start, as he did to such great effect with Jason Kidd while in New Jersey.

Jefferson was the Nets and Bucks top wing defender the past three years, but seemed to pay less mind to that role last season; in fact, the Nets allowed 5.6 points per 48 minutes more when he was on the court. Now with the Spurs, Jefferson could flourish being surrounded by championship players and we expect his defensive numbers to improve

ZACH RANDOLPH


2008-09 STATS: 20.8 PPG, 2.1 APG, 10.1 RPG, 47.5 %FG

WHO HE IS: 6-9, 260 LBS.

What he does: Offensively, Randolph is  a huge talent. The lefthander has outstanding size and a soft touch that he can take as far as 20 feet from the basket, plus he can handle the ball and score off the dribble, usually going to his left from the right block. However, he's a notoriously selfish offensive player who either doesn't read double teams well or doesn't feel like passing out of them. He can battle down low with most power forwards and defend as well as he wants to. With Zach, it all depends on how hard he wants to play. This is a concern.

C ERICK DAMPIER



2008-09 STATS: 5.7 PPG, 7.1 RPG, 1.2 BPG

WHO HE IS: 7-0, 265; 34 YEARS OLD

What he does::  Dampier has become extremely one-dimensional offensively, as he doesn't bother himself much with shooting away from the bucket, or getting post-up touches. The Mavs occasionally bring him out high, but that's only so he can pass to somebody else with an interest in shooting, after which Dampier runs toward the rim so he can chase down a board.

 He's a solid post defender, though, as his size and decent mobility combine to present an obstacle for opposing centers. At 34 he's not as quick as he used to be, but he blocks shots at a high rate and still has pretty good straight-line speed getting back in transition.

THE BENCH

PGs

JORDAN FARMAR


WHO HE IS: 6-2, 180 LBS, 6.4 PPG, 2.4 APG, 23 YEARS OLD

WHAT HE DOES:  A quick, athletic guard who can also shoot from long range, Farmar has the makings of a very good shoot-first point guard, especially when one considers he was only 21 years old last year. He has a good first step he can use to breeze to the basket, though palming violations are an issue, and he's comfortable spotting up on the catch, too. Though he's not big, he also rebounds quite well for his size, ranking 19th among point guards in rebound rate.

Defensively, Farmar is a work in progress. He cut his tendency to pick up silly fouls in the backcourt and did a decent job pressuring the ball, but in the half court he had trouble staying in front of his man and wasn't much of a factor in help situations. His quickness did help him to the 10th best rate of steals among point guards, and he should eventually be quite good as he gains experience.

CJ WATSON


WHO HE IS: 9.5 PPG, 2.7 APG, 1.2 SPG, 25 YEARS OLD

WHAT HE DOES: Though he's a 6-2 point guard, Watson is more of a slashing scorer in the Bobby Jackson mold than a pure point guard. His assist ratios were quite low at both Golden State. e's a good foul shooter too, so if he can get to the stripe in the pros he'll stick around for a while.

SHOOTING GUARDS

GERALD HENDERSON


WHO HE IS 6-4, 215 ROOKIE FROM DUKE

WHAT HE DOES: As a shot-creator, Henderson looks excellent, both in terms of the volume of shots he was able to create in isolation situations (ranking 5th), and in his ability to convert these opportunities, at 42%. He also appears capable of making some plays on the pick and roll, which is a nice bonus. Like a lot of college players we looked at, Henderson is much better operating with his strong hand (his right)—converting 51% of his drives with that hand, compared with just 37% with his left. This part of his game is going to be key for him moving forward, as he ranks quite poorly as a jump shooter compared to his peers in his ability to catch and shoot (.7 PPP guarded, 1.15 PPP unguarded) or pull-up off the dribble (.79 PPP). Henderson made big strides with his perimeter jump-shot this past season, but he obviously still has a long ways to go.

In terms of his ability to contribute immediately, there are a lot of reasons to like Henderson. He does not turn the ball over much at all (5th) and draws fouls at a nice rate (5th). His athleticism hives him some considerable upside, and his defensive ability and playmaking skills are important to his stock as well. At this point, Henderson’s limitations are abundantly obvious, but they also appear to be highly correctable, and he does other things well enough to make an impact while he rounds out the rest of his game

JODIE MEEKS




WHO HE IS 6-4, 211 LBS, ROOKIE FROM KENTUCKY

WHAT HE DOES: Meeks’ catch and shoot ability looks a lot like AL Thornton’s, only he takes more open shots and forces less. He can hit tough shots, but is not as deadly as you might think when left open, at just 1.21 PPP. Unlike Thornton, Meeks is quite a shooter off the dribble, scoring .99 PPP on 4.7 pull up jumpers per game. His 1.11 PPP in spot up situations is above average, an indication that his ability to hit the three somewhat compensates for his inefficient in other areas.

Meeks didn’t get many touches on isolations or pick and rolls, but was relatively efficient in both situations. He ranked second in transition possessions per game at 5.5, and was slightly above average at 1.2 PPP looking good in the open floor. His ability to finish around the rim came out a bit better than we might have anticipated, as he both got there often (4th most), and was ranked 2nd in completing plays once there, at 1.2 PPP. He also showed the very valuable ability to do some damage coming off of screens in half court sets, scoring 1.04 PPP on a third ranked 2.9 shots off of screens per game. Turning the ball over on a little more than a tenth of his used possessions, Meeks didn’t score quite as frequently as some of the other players on our list, but his three point shooting prowess helped him look very solid in this analysis.

SMALL FORWARDS

Peja Stojakovic


WHO HE IS: 6-10, 230 LBS; 13.3 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 1.2 APG; 32 YEARS OLD

WHAT HE DOES: One of the sweetest shooters to play the game, he's deadly spotting up from the wings or corners, however, and because of his size he can usually wriggle free for a step-back J at the end of the shot clock. The Hornets also run pin-downs for him to keep him involved, but he's better off on a straight catch-and-shoot.

Defensively,  his size helps him make up for some of the quickness shortfall and nobody posts him up because he's so big, but he's increasingly vulnerable to speedy wings. It would be easier if they could move him to power forward, but his inability to rebound or block shots would be a glaring issue there.

POWER FORWARD

JOSH POWELL


WHO HE IS: 6-9, 240; 4.2 PPG, 2.9 RPG, 26 YEARS OLD

WHAT HE DOES: Powell is really a power forward and is far too undersized to be playing regularly at center, but he makes opponents work on defense and if the size mismatch isn't too great he does a solid job overall.  If he can establish his 15-footer as a threat he becomes a much more plausible offensive option, and that may be his ticket to staying in the league.

DERRICK BROWN


WHO HE IS: 6-9, 225 LBS; ROOKIE FROM XAVIER

WHAT HE DOES: Much has already been written about Brown's athleticism, so there is no need to go into extreme depth here. He has a freakish wingspan to go along with quick, explosive leaping ability. The aforementioned athleticism resulted in 73 dunks last season. Not just a leaper, he also possesses an outstanding first step and excellent lateral quickness. There is very little more that one could ask for athletically out of a 6'7 combo forward.

The vast majority of Brown's damage on the offensive end was done around the rim last season, usually off shots created for him by teammates. Over 80% of his field goal attempts in fact came off shots right around the rim, which tells you quite a bit about his role offensively. An incredibly efficient player for that reason, he shot nearly 61% from the field. Proving capable of finishing at the basket with either hand, he showed a limited ability to utilize mismatches by posting smaller opponents. At the same time, he was able on rare occasions to use his great first step to blow by slower defenders off of the dribble. The bulk of Brown's scoring is predicated off of his athleticism and energetic style of play at the moment, rather than any kind of high skill-level.

On the defensive end, Brown has all of the characteristics of an eventual lockdown defender. Able to guard both forward slots, he appeals to NBA scouts because of his versatility on this end of the hardwood. Owning the quickness to stay in front of smaller defenders, while also possessing the length and strength to guard bigger players, he offers a large amount of intrigue on this end. Just an average rebounder, Brown is capable of improving upon this area with more of an emphasis on boxing out rather than just relying upon his athleticism to snag rebounds. Getting stronger would probably help as well.

/PF/CENTER
MATT BONNER



WHO HE IS: 6-10, 240 LBS, 8.2 PPG, 4.8 RPG, 29 YEARS OLD

WHAT HE DOES: His biggest obstacles to more minutes for Bonner are his defensive limitations. He's 6-10 but doesn't elevate and isn't particularly mobile, so it's tough to find acceptable matchups for him. Additionally, he doesn't provide much in the way of help-side defense or shot blocking. He is physical, however, and does a decent job on the glass.

Offensively, Bonner is a spot-up 3-point shooter with a quick release off the top of his right shoulder. If defenders run him off the shot he'll head fake and drive into the paint for a shorter look, but he's not a deft dribbler and if he takes more than one bounce a turnover becomes increasingly likely.

INACTIVE PLAYERS MARCUS HAISLIP AND NATHAN JAWAI

DRAFT STRATEGY
The Timberwolves were to pick 8th overall but failure of the original ownership to show up put us in a bind. Our group didn't have time to construct a draft strategy in the days leading up to the draft. We were unable to move around picks because we didn't have ownership until midway through the second round. If we would have had the 8th pick, we would have picked Brandon Roy.

We decided to grab a legit PG and SF with our first 2 picks in the second round. We feel lke we did a good job blending some vets like Dampier and Peja with some young players and feel we can compete now as well as in the future. Our plan was to get the best players possible in the situation we were in.

TOUGHEST DECISION:
Trading David Lee for Dampier and Peja was a tough call for us. We love David Lee's game and hustle. But we felt we needed a legit center to match up with the bigger bodies in the NBA. Dampier can provide that. We also received Peja in the deal. We felt we had a massive hole on our bench at SF and a 6'10 pure shooter like Peja went a long way to fill that.

BEST MOVE/WORST MOVE
I think getting John Salmons when we did was our best move. We love the fact he can play the 2 and 3. He is a very good defender and can be a solid offensive choice. He has shown he can take over games and will complement the other players on our team well. Getting Zach Randolph in the 6th round was something we like. We watched him slip each round and finally had to pull the trigger on him. Yes, he can be a problem but he is a double-double guy that can bolster our frontline.

Worst move? might be trading David Lee, but time will tell.

OUTLOOK
We are not the propaganda machine that some of the other teams are in our division. We feel we can be one of the top 8 teams in the West. We think we have a very solid base for now as well as the future with our 3 rookies on the team. We prefer to quietly go about our business, winning basketball games and working toward getting into the playoffs.






























Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #107 on: August 10, 2009, 09:51:14 AM »

Offline Gainesville Celtic

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5544
  • Tommy Points: 1331
  • Ainge *still* has a Posse! Ubuntu Y'all
a few questions for Edgar/Roy of Portland

(when i read your presser before bed last night this tread was 2 pages, now it's 7 so appologies if this has been asked/answered):

--- I saw your idea of essentially having 2 starting lineups based on matchups  --- an interesting idea. (a) Any concerns that a guy like J O'neal (a career starter) has problems coming off the bench behind R. Lewis? Is this  a potential Iverson/Hamilton situation? (b) with the larger lineup ---- 2 O'neals, Bibby, Redd and Lewis --- that might be the weakest perimeter defense in the CBD (redd + lewis). How do you overcome that? Lewis' advantages come on the offensive end and with matchups. His lateral movement and man-to-man D are very weak (his poor rebounding shouldn't be an issue w/ the O'neals)

--- Over the past several years Shaq has been uneven, shall we say, in his effort and production. A good year last year but he clearly didn't fit with an ensemble cast in PHO (clearly playing style had some to do with it). Why should we think he's gonna fit better with the CrotorNats, or give 100% with a team without a clear alpha dog?

--- You've done a good job of building depth to deal with injuries. But if players miss 10 games here and there aren't there concerns about younger guys like Gomes, West and Turiaf having a hard time dealing with ever-changing roles?


--- No trades --- outside the Gerald Green blockbuster & the deal for Shaq--- during/after the draft that I recall. Why? Opportunity, desire, time?
GC's Yahoo! H2h League: Gainesville Celtics: 2014, 2016, 2017 Champs!

GC's Yahoo! H2h League permanent website (offseason roster, constitution, etc.) * Lucky was framed!

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #108 on: August 10, 2009, 09:51:32 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Roy I know you've addressed the minutes issue, but do you think there may be problems with there not being enough shots for everyone.  We know Shaq has complained about not getting the touches he deserves, and you also have guys who like to take a lot of shots, how is this going to effect the team chemistry.  Also who do you give the responsibility of taking the last shot to the detriment of the other players on the team who also feel they have the ability to be clutch.

More than anything else, Shaq likes two things:  winning, and attention.  So long as he gets love and recognition, he won't care what his numbers look like.  To the extent he griped in Phoenix in the 2008 season, it's because his lack of touches was hurting the team, and wasn't allowing them to win.  Our team, on the other hand, sees Shaq as a center-piece; his ability to command a double-team in the paint is going to open up things for everybody else.

The "last shot" question is always an interesting one, but I wonder if it's something that is more in the mind of the fans than the players.  I'll give two examples, the 2008 Celtics and the 2009 Magic.  Both of those teams were filled by strong personalities, and by players who have made tons of clutch shots in the past.  Neither team had a problem with deferring to the open man, for the greater good of the team.

We're blessed to have several big name players who have made clutch shots in the past.  Rashard, Bibby, and Manu have all made big shots in their careers.  While Rashard is probably our first option if we need a three, we're comfortable with any of those players attempting a last second shot.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #109 on: August 10, 2009, 09:52:51 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42583
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.


That picture is more adorable than six puppies tucking six kittens into bed because they're just too sleepy. You guys hear John Melloncamp playin? Cougs? You out there?

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #110 on: August 10, 2009, 09:56:40 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48120
  • Tommy Points: 8794
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
BTW since this is the place where most of the traffic will be seen about the game today I just want to say how very, very, very impressed I am with all the pressers being released by everyone. I think we all put in a lot of time and put in some very creative stuff that was even formatted very professionally. TPs to everyone involved. Really, really excellent stuff all around by all the GMs that have thus far participated. I think we all should feel pretty proud of the jobs we have done.

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #111 on: August 10, 2009, 09:59:03 AM »

Offline StartOrien

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12961
  • Tommy Points: 1200
Question for CelticinOrlando,

Are you at all concerned that many of your players seem to need the ball?

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #112 on: August 10, 2009, 10:00:53 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42583
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
BTW since this is the place where most of the traffic will be seen about the game today I just want to say how very, very, very impressed I am with all the pressers being released by everyone. I think we all put in a lot of time and put in some very creative stuff that was even formatted very professionally. TPs to everyone involved. Really, really excellent stuff all around by all the GMs that have thus far participated. I think we all should feel pretty proud of the jobs we have done.
Rumor has it that the commissioner saved the best for last.

Recent twitter from Phoenix GM Jesse "The Body" Ventura:
Quote
It iz not tru that we R havin IndeedProceed wrestle Bobby the Friendly bear right b4 our press release. It iz tru that I am going to be at the Scranton PA Chuckie Cheeze signing autographs from 3pm-8pm tues night.

Oh man. Jesse Ventura loves his twitter.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #113 on: August 10, 2009, 10:04:33 AM »

Online celticinorlando

  • John Havlicek
  • ****************************
  • Posts: 28546
  • Tommy Points: 662
  • MASTER OF PANIC
Not really. I think Nelson playing with guys that need the ball like Howard, Hedo, Lewis shows he can facilitate as well as score. Salmons played with Martin in Sacramento as well as Ben Gordon...two high volume shooters and played well with them. Jefferson played with Jason Kidd and Vince Carter and seemed to co-exist with those two. Randolph again is the wildcard. But be has played with some very big egos in the past and we feel he will be fine. We want Peja to be the focal offensive player off the bench. There is always concerns about chemistry but we like having several guys that can score if need be

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #114 on: August 10, 2009, 10:04:42 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48120
  • Tommy Points: 8794
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Portland, do you have any concerns that the men you have listed on your PF depth chart have, over recent years, been playing so much more at the center position and that their bodies may have morphed more into "center type" bodies and not the body type that is needed to guard some of the better power forwards in the league?

It seems the one PF you have on your squad is listed at SF and that you have four centers that you are trying to squeeze into two center and two PF positions on your depth chart.

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #115 on: August 10, 2009, 10:05:42 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42583
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
a few questions for Edgar/Roy of Portland

(when i read your presser before bed last night this tread was 2 pages, now it's 7 so appologies if this has been asked/answered):

--- I saw your idea of essentially having 2 starting lineups based on matchups  --- an interesting idea. (a) Any concerns that a guy like J O'neal (a career starter) has problems coming off the bench behind R. Lewis? Is this  a potential Iverson/Hamilton situation? (b) with the larger lineup ---- 2 O'neals, Bibby, Redd and Lewis --- that might be the weakest perimeter defense in the CBD (redd + lewis). How do you overcome that? Lewis' advantages come on the offensive end and with matchups. His lateral movement and man-to-man D are very weak (his poor rebounding shouldn't be an issue w/ the O'neals)

--- Over the past several years Shaq has been uneven, shall we say, in his effort and production. A good year last year but he clearly didn't fit with an ensemble cast in PHO (clearly playing style had some to do with it). Why should we think he's gonna fit better with the CrotorNats, or give 100% with a team without a clear alpha dog?

--- You've done a good job of building depth to deal with injuries. But if players miss 10 games here and there aren't there concerns about younger guys like Gomes, West and Turiaf having a hard time dealing with ever-changing roles?


--- No trades --- outside the Gerald Green blockbuster & the deal for Shaq--- during/after the draft that I recall. Why? Opportunity, desire, time?

GC...go back and read the epic battle roy and I had last night. He kinda answered a lot of those then.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #116 on: August 10, 2009, 10:06:10 AM »

Offline Edgar

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24646
  • Tommy Points: 445
  • No contaban con mi astucia !!!
a few questions for Edgar/Roy of Portland


1)--- You've done a good job of building depth to deal with injuries. But if players miss 10 games here and there aren't there concerns about younger guys like Gomes, West and Turiaf having a hard time dealing with ever-changing roles?



2)--- No trades --- outside the Gerald Green blockbuster & the deal for Shaq--- during/after the draft that I recall. Why? Opportunity, desire, time?

1) Delonte and Gomes are young vets now in this league
delonte even have deep playoff experience and showed he can adjust between the 2 guard slots. Turiaf too.

2) We were the first team to pull a big trade , letting go our first rounder for a couple of picks that allow us to have those 2 starting lineups and a very good 3rd team.
No player in our roster was picked after round 11th.
that talks a LOT about the quality and dedication the GM put in this effort ;)


I will leave the other answers to Mr. hobbs, because he is Shaqs agent too.
Once a CrotorNat always a CROTORNAT  2 times CB draft Champion 2009-2012

Nice to be back!

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #117 on: August 10, 2009, 10:06:16 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34023
  • Tommy Points: 1607
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
This question is for the General Manager of the Denver Nuggets.

The future of Greg Oden is very much still very uncertain, as admitted even by you in a probably ill-advised post comparing his offensive non-dominance to that of Bill Russell's(maybe not the best of comparisons for Oden on a Celtics lovers sight where votes will determine your team's future.) That said looking back, if you lose team of the future could it be attributable to a very risky and poor decision on your part to reach by selecting Oden in the first round when you could possibly have traded out of the 1st round and still selected him well into the second or even chosen a more established young player who was still very young and had All-Star potential like Horford, Biedrins, Lopez or even Okafor?

Just one man's opinion but I think you put the entire future of your team's success squarely on the shoulders of Oden and there are still many across the real NBA and here at CB that doubt this man's ability to become a fraction of his hype.

BY the way just chiming in, in 4 years I think he's the real deal but I think it's going take that long for him to get his body and mind up to to NBA speed.

Simple.  Oden has the biggest upside.  And from where I picked, he had the biggest potential to be a franchise player.  

As for not trading down, I got the man I wanted.  And through other trades, I was able to gather a roster so deep in young talent, I didn't need to trade down in the 1st round.  If I missed him in the draft, my drafting plan would have been trashed.  


And, the team is not completely dependent on Oden.  Not with the amount of young depth I have (useful in trading for a big talent).  And not with Yao Ming coming back next year.  

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #118 on: August 10, 2009, 10:07:36 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
--- I saw your idea of essentially having 2 starting lineups based on matchups  --- an interesting idea. (a) Any concerns that a guy like J O'neal (a career starter) has problems coming off the bench behind R. Lewis? Is this  a potential Iverson/Hamilton situation?

We're going to try to foster the attitude on our team that starting is simply semantics.  Regardless of whether he starts, J.O. will be counted on to be a huge contributor.  Jermaine is a smart, articulate guy, who is intensely loyal and passionate about winning.  He knows that this is his best shot at a ring, and nothing in his past has led me to believe that he's a trouble maker on a winning team.  It further helps, of course, that arguably the best player on our team (Manu) is willing to accept a sixth man role.

Quote
(b) with the larger lineup ---- 2 O'neals, Bibby, Redd and Lewis --- that might be the weakest perimeter defense in the CBD (redd + lewis). How do you overcome that? Lewis' advantages come on the offensive end and with matchups. His lateral movement and man-to-man D are very weak (his poor rebounding shouldn't be an issue w/ the O'neals)

I wouldn't call Lewis' small forward defense "very weak".  We can only go by our own observations in this regard, as it's impossible to prove.  However, Rashard has the athleticism and size to be a good perimeter defender.  If people want to use defensive metrics like the ones Hollinger likes to use, the last season Rashard was a SF the team was better defensively with him on the court, and he held opposing SFs to a 15.5 Opponent's PER.  Also, of course, Rashard was a key component on the #1 rated team last season in terms of points allowed per 100 possessions.

Quote
--- Over the past several years Shaq has been uneven, shall we say, in his effort and production. A good year last year but he clearly didn't fit with an ensemble cast in PHO (clearly playing style had some to do with it). Why should we think he's gonna fit better with the CrotorNats, or give 100% with a team without a clear alpha dog?

We've addressed this one a bit, but Shaq needs a chance to win, motivation, and attention.  He's got all three this year.  The reason he wasn't a good fit in Phoenix was because the team was an absolute mess.

Quote
--- You've done a good job of building depth to deal with injuries. But if players miss 10 games here and there aren't there concerns about younger guys like Gomes, West and Turiaf having a hard time dealing with ever-changing roles?

The three guys you've mentioned have dealt with ever-changing roles their entire careers, and have never griped.  Instead, they've continued to play effectively, whether it be as starters, rotation players, or deep bench players.  We drafted based on fit as much as we did talent, which is why, for instance, we repeatedly passed on guys like Nate Robinson and Jamal Crawford.

Quote
--- No trades --- outside the Gerald Green blockbuster & the deal for Shaq--- during/after the draft that I recall. Why? Opportunity, desire, time?

We made a couple of other minor trades for draft picks.  We moved down five slots in the second, for instance, to get more depth.  That move legitimately worried us, as we thought somebody may grab the guy we were targeting (Manu).  We moved down a couple of other times, and in one deal, moved up into the third (using two fifths), only to move back down again (to acquire a fourth and a fifth).

We explored a lot of trades, but overall, we thought the asking prices were too high.  Most of the teams we were exchanging offers with were in a similar "win now" mode, so most GMs were savvy enough to not want to help a rival.  We didn't really actively try to move up, because after the first three picks we knew we had a solid foundation, and didn't want to jeopardize our depth to go after players who we thought might slip to us.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: CB Draft '09 Mock Press Conference: Northwest Division
« Reply #119 on: August 10, 2009, 10:08:23 AM »

Offline Edgar

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24646
  • Tommy Points: 445
  • No contaban con mi astucia !!!
Portland, do you have any concerns that the men you have listed on your PF depth chart have, over recent years, been playing so much more at the center position and that their bodies may have morphed more into "center type" bodies and not the body type that is needed to guard some of the better power forwards in the league?

It seems the one PF you have on your squad is listed at SF and that you have four centers that you are trying to squeeze into two center and two PF positions on your depth chart.

no concern
JO is getting faster every day after recovering well from injuries
Turiaf is very movile for a man his size in the BBD type of playing
Of course thats the beauty of our team
versatility in the name of rashard and Gomes, who can play against faster PF too.
Once a CrotorNat always a CROTORNAT  2 times CB draft Champion 2009-2012

Nice to be back!