Author Topic: Why wasn't it Dozier,if we stayed there?  (Read 2077 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Why wasn't it Dozier,if we stayed there?
« on: June 29, 2009, 06:01:49 AM »

Offline RmbrRuss

  • Oshae Brissett
  • Posts: 74
  • Tommy Points: 7
Maybe  the guy is weak but he's  6"10 and long and seemed to play when i watched him.

Re: Why wasn't it Dozier,if we stayed there?
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2009, 01:48:49 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
Probably because in terms of talent Hudson was higher on our draft board.

And we're also going to try to get a big in free agency, we don't need another young-ish guy who may or may not play.

They probably figured if they were gonna take on a guy who's a long shot it might as well be somebody who fell in the draft and who could maybe replace a guy they might lose this year or a year or two down the road (Eddie House).
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Why wasn't it Dozier,if we stayed there?
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2009, 02:26:12 PM »

Offline hardlyyardley

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1191
  • Tommy Points: 149
it's a thing called untalented

Re: Why wasn't it Dozier,if we stayed there?
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2009, 02:29:14 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11449
  • Tommy Points: 5350
  • Thumper of the BASS!
i figured moore would be great here cause of his size and speed...