We have two of the better starting bigs in the league in Perk and KG. From the bench we usually see Powe or Davis first followed by Scalabrine depending on matchups. We all know POB isnt getting much burn.
Not really a terrifying group off the bench, but not too bad either when compared to the rest of the league depth wise. I contend that while we would all like to add a Joe Smith type player for bigman depth before the deadline, we may be just fine without one.
Example: The Spurs are doing just fine with Matt Bonner starting alongside Timmy and Kurt Thomas followed by Oberto coming off the bench. Does anyone really think those four are better than our Bigs?
Example: The Lakers start Gasol (and sometimes Bynum)and whoever, with Odom as the primary backup.
Example: Detroit starts Sheed and Amir Johnson, bring MacDyess and Maxiell off the bench.
I could go on listing Cleveland, Atlanta and others, but I just dont see a huge amount of advantage (if any) for the opposition in terms of depth. If we follow the Spurs model for example, using Brian Scalabrine (Not as a starter but off the bench) like they use Matt Bonner, then we still have Perk, Powe and Davis. Not bad IMO.