I've yet to see how a 6-7mil contract for a bench player is going to be a huge detriment to our team in 2011...
That's because you don't have to sign the paychecks. Neither do people who refer to Wyc as cheap even though he has one of the highest payrolls in the league. Consider that if NO is under the luxury tax then Posey's costing them 1/2 what he would cost us and they still don't want to pay him.
So are you saying the Cs are going to be under the luxury tax in 2011 by not signing Pose?
Plus, in 2010 and 2011, Pose would be signed already, so it wouldn't be his salary that you'd be doubling, it would be the players that we signed that season that we would be doubling. Using the other logic would be like arguing that we are paying Scals 7 mil this year...
Look, I don't think Wyc is cheap. I think they just misread the market on Posey. Does it make good business sense to not pay Pose more than he is worth on the open market? Sure.
I don't fault them for trying to get Posey for less years or money. they just got ambushed by NO at the 11th hour. My basic feeling is that they did not have a chance to match and would have if given that chance.
you know, the people who keep pushing this "not signing the paychecks" angle never take into consideration the cost of either not winning another Title or not even making it back to the Finals.
there is a huge financial incentive for this team to get another Title.
I, along with the rest of us, saw that Wyc interview and that IMO is the best evidence that the luxury tax is not the focus of this ownership.