Winning can't be the sole factor in choosing the all-star players, but it should play a role. I'm sorry, but Chris Bosh does not deserve to start in the all-star game over Kevin Garnett. No way. The Raptors were a trendy pick to challenge the Celtics in the Atlantic, or at least to challenge for home court in the first round of the playoffs. But instead, they're last in the division, and just from the games against the Celtics you can see what Bosh's problem is. He may put up some good numbers, but once crunch time comes, he disappears.
Agreed. GP's idea of an all-star, purely based on stats, not any other outside factors is retarded. So here's a question? Let's say the Cavs were complete trash this year, one of the worst 5 teams in the league, except LeBron is still putting up his current numbers...27.9 ppg, 7.50 rpg, 7.0 apg, 2.0 spg, +30.53 EFF rating. Should he be an AS? Statistically, GP would say yes...If you disagree, who would you put in his place?
As I said in an earlier post: obviously, stats need to count, but what about your effect on the team's overall performance, etc? LeBron would put butts in the seats, and ultimately that's all the marketing/business aspect of the league really cares about, but I definitely would put someone in his place that was average 3-5 ppg less, 1-2 assists less, etc.