This team would be the best offense in the league if Rondo had some kind of a jump-shot and this has NOTHING to do with his scoring.
His lack of a jump-shot impacts the game very deeply, Doc has been doing a great job hiding that factor.
Rondo could obviously shoot better, but he had a decent jump shot last year and we weren't near being the best team offensively.
A decent jump-shot compared to whom? Mine?
he shot 41% on his jumper, according to roy in the thread we hashed out this summer over this (he'll have to give you the referance)
The PG average is around 44-46%
so, he's below average but certainly not ben wallace.
Rondo shot 42% on his jumpers last season. Tony Parker, to whom he's often compared, shot at a similar rate, 43%, in his sophomore year. However, this doesn't tell the whole story, it's easy to figure out why.
Rondo has the worst jumper among all the starting point-guards in the league. Devin Harris and Raymond Felton are close, but they are still better and have some range. This is not merely bellow average, it's bottom cellar.
Ronjo is a guard, what's exactly the point of comparing him to Ben Wallace, probably the worse shooter in the all league? I mean, he's decent because he shots better than Ben Wallace?
42% was the worst of every single starting PG last year on a jumper? can you post your site?
I belive you, i'd just like to see the list.
also, what do you mean it doesn't tell the whole story and it's easy to figure out why? do you mean he doesn't shoot the precentage the NBA credits him with, or that its really low for a PG?
No ones saying He's a great jump shooter, but you implied his was horrable (apologies if your a realy good shooter
) so how can you then say
1. he shot similar to tony parker, a guy who came in with no shot
2. say he shot 42%, which is a below average jumper to be sure, but not terrable.
and then dismiss all that and say he's the worst jumpshooter in the league?