Author Topic: Starbury's Future? Not so good.  (Read 3793 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« on: November 01, 2008, 09:11:22 AM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8635
  • Tommy Points: 1136

Demoted again to street clothes. I say we trade all the stars that fell off the map to the "Thunder".

Even though he is still a rookie Oden's the Center with...

Oden
A. Walker
D. Miles
S. Francis... Is he In the league this Year?
S. Marbury

How many games could this awesome team win???

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2008, 09:19:16 AM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30921
  • Tommy Points: 3766
  • Yup

Demoted again to street clothes. I say we trade all the stars that fell off the map to the "Thunder".

Even though he is still a rookie Oden's the Center with...

Oden
A. Walker
D. Miles
S. Francis... Is he In the league this Year?
S. Marbury

How many games could this awesome team win???

Marbury apparently requested to be in street clothes if he wasn't going to play, and had his request granted.

Francis is on Houston's roster still.

Miles is miles from being ready to play.

And Twoin is just biding his time until his inevitable prophetic triumphant return to green ;)
Yup

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2008, 09:21:31 AM »

Offline kw10

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1109
  • Tommy Points: 49
  • KG is da Man
Yes Francis is still in the league, with the Rockets if I'm not mistaken. I'm not sure if I entirely understand your post, but may I add Keith Van Horn as 6th man? With Eddy Curry and Zach Randolph?
Anything is possible!!!

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2008, 09:26:29 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7642
  • Tommy Points: 441
Substitute Eddie Curry for Oden and this is the perfect ball hogging/no defense superstars in their own minds team!

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2008, 09:27:01 AM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21217
  • Tommy Points: 2450

Demoted again to street clothes. I say we trade all the stars that fell off the map to the "Thunder".

Even though he is still a rookie Oden's the Center with...

Oden
A. Walker
D. Miles
S. Francis... Is he In the league this Year?
S. Marbury

How many games could this awesome team win???

Marbury apparently requested to be in street clothes if he wasn't going to play, and had his request granted.

Francis is on Houston's roster still.

Miles is miles from being ready to play.

And Twoin is just biding his time until his inevitable prophetic triumphant return to green ;)

...or the buffet. Which ever comes first. ;)
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2008, 10:03:42 AM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 47517
  • Tommy Points: 2404
Atlanta should trade Mike Bibby for Starbury

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2008, 10:13:32 AM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8635
  • Tommy Points: 1136

Moiso, you understood my post perfectly. Eddy curry for Oden makes that team amazingly awful.

Any  other names you can think of for the bench.

Guys that you thought would be awesome like Curry. Only to find out all the intangibles are non exsistent.

That's why we all loved Posey so much. He's the opposite of those bums.

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2008, 10:30:44 AM »

Offline cdif911

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4868
  • Tommy Points: 43

Moiso, you understood my post perfectly. Eddy curry for Oden makes that team amazingly awful.

Any  other names you can think of for the bench.

Guys that you thought would be awesome like Curry. Only to find out all the intangibles are non exsistent.

That's why we all loved Posey so much. He's the opposite of those bums.

I never thought Eddy Curry would be awesome, I did think he was one scary dude though, loves to sneak up behind you and do who knows what... - tell me this picture won't give you nightmares:

When you love life, life loves you right back


Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #8 on: November 01, 2008, 10:40:41 AM »

Offline KG Living Legend

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8635
  • Tommy Points: 1136

LOL. Come on though curry was a beast for a minute there.

If they would have been smart enough to trade him, when they found out he was a lazy bum.

At his peak moment you could have got more than you think for EC.

19.5 PPG and 7 boards at 24 years old. He also blocked 1.1 shots per game with chicago a couple years earlier. Now he's down to .5    Pathetic for a guy with such gifts.

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #9 on: November 01, 2008, 10:54:42 AM »

Offline bdm860

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5991
  • Tommy Points: 4593
You should probably bring in Derrick Coleman to coach and this could be the beginning of Tractor Traylor's glorious return to the NBA.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2008, 11:05:36 AM by bdm860 »

After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2008, 11:27:36 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7642
  • Tommy Points: 441
I thought all of those players were going to be awesome early in their careers.  Hmm, who else are we forgetting?

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2008, 11:29:51 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7642
  • Tommy Points: 441
Bargnani may fit in as far as not living up to the hype, but doesn't fit the psychological profile.

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2008, 11:34:52 AM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30921
  • Tommy Points: 3766
  • Yup
Bargnani may fit in as far as not living up to the hype, but doesn't fit the psychological profile.

19 pts for the Bargn-Yard Dog last night
Yup

Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2008, 11:53:44 AM »

Offline cdif911

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4868
  • Tommy Points: 43
how can you leave Shawn Kemp out of this picture? C'mon, the Reign Man in the Thunder Dome... its perfect

Also basically anyone the clippers have ever drafted can fit into this team too
When you love life, life loves you right back


Re: Starbury's Future? Not so good.
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2008, 11:57:27 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7642
  • Tommy Points: 441
Well if we are doing past players, then we have a lot to choose from- olowakandi anyone?  Next year we can put Tyrus Thomas on this list if he doesn't improve at all.