Author Topic: ultimate NFL power rankings  (Read 3989 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ultimate NFL power rankings
« on: September 19, 2008, 02:20:31 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12578
  • Tommy Points: 2156
The only color that matters is GREEN

Re: ultimate NFL power rankings
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2008, 02:29:59 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31055
  • Tommy Points: 1615
  • What a Pub Should Be
It goes back to the 1970 merger.

Patriots had some extremely difficult days in the early '70s as well as most of the 80s and the early 90s. 

I might not be in total agreement with the rankings but I sorta understand why the Patriots fall where they fall.  It's not because of the past decade or so, its the history before that.

EDIT:  Also, this poll takes into account, MNF football appearances.  For quite a while, I believe '81 or so until '95, MNF wasn't even allowed in Foxboro.  That's a severe hinderance alone.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: ultimate NFL power rankings
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2008, 02:38:48 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30910
  • Tommy Points: 3766
  • Yup
Interesting breakdown.  Vikings definitely get credit for rarely sucking, more than being great often.

Now, if they did one of those for the NBA who is on top?

Yup

Re: ultimate NFL power rankings
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2008, 02:41:48 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Interesting breakdown.  Vikings definitely get credit for rarely sucking, more than being great often.

Now, if they did one of those for the NBA who is on top?



With media bias, I'm saying they give it to the Lakers.  Blech.


All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: ultimate NFL power rankings
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2008, 03:32:09 PM »

Offline ChampKind

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3079
  • Tommy Points: 665
  • I left Indiana. Because it was horrible.
The Rams and Vikings ahead of the Pats?




http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=nflrankings/1-10/080917

Makes sense to me.  From 1970-2000 we were awful, marked by 2 Super Bowl losses, a few awful draft picks, and only 2 Hall of Famers (Hannah, Tippett).

If the rankings were from 2000-present, then we'd win easily.  But I gotta say I agree with them here.
CB Draft Bucks: Chris Paul, Dwight Howard, Tobias Harris, Zach LaVine, Aaron Afflalo, Jeff Green, Donatas Motiejunas, Jarrett Jack, Frank Kaminsky, Lance Stephenson, JaVale McGee, Shane Larkin, Nick Young

DKC Bucks. Also terrible.

http://www.anchorofgold.com

Re: ultimate NFL power rankings
« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2008, 09:07:49 PM »

Offline Celtsfan33/34

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 35
  • Tommy Points: 1
OK, once again the Giants receive no respect.  Typical media bias against them like they faced last year and this year so far.  In no universe are the Rams, Broncos, Raiders, Vikings, or Patriots better franchises than the New York Football Giants.

Re: ultimate NFL power rankings
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2008, 09:14:06 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30910
  • Tommy Points: 3766
  • Yup
OK, once again the Giants receive no respect.  Typical media bias against them like they faced last year and this year so far.  In no universe are the Rams, Broncos, Raiders, Vikings, or Patriots better franchises than the New York Football Giants.

It seems to reward sustained eras of excellence which the Giants really only achieved in the mid 80's to 1990(in the Super Bowl era).  They also failed to make the Playoffs after their previous two Super Bowl titles.  That should change this year.  I'm not saying they shouldn't be ahead of the Rams or Vikings, just pointing to some of the negatives they might have used against them in this ranking system.
Yup