i wasent aware it was a competition, nor do i care about your approval.
i was simply pointing out, in a fun way, that while i agree with you on most points in your post, all of them are very one sided, and seen through a perspective i share. I've seen similar posts while trolling over on lakers blog, excusing kobe and blaming everything on the media.
i'm sure they feel just as justified making them as we do about paul.
It isn't a competition. If you feel the need to chime in, it would be nice if you brought something salient to the discussion, if that's possible.
what else did you want me to bring to a one paragraph exoneration of paul that includes a celtic centered version of events we've rehashed 300 times? I said i agreed with you in principle, but pointed out that its written with a very celtic tilt to it.
also, see my above post. theres not much content to your post other than "its different because it's paul"
its different when he sits out so we can tank
its different when he leaks trade demands
its diffrent when he pulls one of the most childish acts ive seen after a playoff loss.
and, while i agree that those incidents were very different, I still dont agree with your stance that everything paul does is excusable. paul was a dink when he was younger, part of the reason he is my favorite player is because ive gotten to watch him grow up while i grow up.
what nick and iwoa were pointing out, correctly, is that we have a different opinion on those events because were celtic fans.