Author Topic: Losing the Finals is bad for the future  (Read 2019 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Losing the Finals is bad for the future
« on: July 26, 2008, 11:41:18 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33645
  • Tommy Points: 1549
Since the Bulls started their run in 1991 only the Nets and Jazz were able to make it back to the finals any time during the next three seasons (and they both did back to back).  The three years after the second appearnce neither team made it out of the second round.  Of the remaining years, only the Magic, Knicks, and Pistons were able to reach the Conference Finals the year after reaching the finals (and the magic and knicks missed the playoffs in the third year).  Only the Pistons made the Conference finals in the second or third year after losing in the finals.

Everyone always seems to talk about how hard it is to repeat, which of course it is, but no one ever seems to mention how badly the losers perform in the following seasons.  Without the recent Pistons run, championship losers would be downright awful.

1991 Lakers - lost in first round, lost in first round, missed playoffs
1992 Blazers - lost in first round, lost in first round, lost in first round
1993 Suns - lost in second round, lost in second round, lost in first round
1994 Knicks - lost in second round, lost in second round, lost in second round
1995 Magic - lost in third round, lost in first round, missed playoffs
1996 Sonics - lost in second round, lost in second round, missed playoffs
1997 Jazz - lost in finals, lost in second round, lost in second round
1998 Jazz - lost in second round, lost in second round, lost in first round
1999 Knicks - lost in third round, lost in first round, missed playoffs
2000 Pacers - lost in first round, lost in first round, lost in first round
2001 Sixers - lost in first round, lost in second round, missed playoffs
2002 Nets - lost in finals, lost in second round, lost in first round
2003 Nets - lost in second round, lost in first round, lost in second
2004 Lakers - missed playoffs, lost in first round, lost in first round
2005 Pistons - lost in third round, lost in third round, lost in third round
2006 Mavericks - lost in first round, lost in first round
2007 Cavs - lost in second round
« Last Edit: July 28, 2008, 09:12:09 PM by Moranis »
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip

Re: Losing the Finals is bad for the future
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2008, 11:44:20 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34023
  • Tommy Points: 1607
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
You can find the same in many sports. 


For a while in the NFL, the losing team was missing the playoffs. 

Re: Losing the Finals is bad for the future
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2008, 12:06:44 AM »

Offline soap07

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1557
  • Tommy Points: 145
Excellent research.

Re: Losing the Finals is bad for the future
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2008, 12:13:39 AM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 47514
  • Tommy Points: 2404
Hmmm .... Who would the Cavs and Lakers be most like on that list?

I think the Cavs are most like Phily. On the bright side for Cleveland I think Philadelphia's tour ended mostly out of bad management and Iverson's flaws which are both completely avoidable for the Cavs.

The Lakers are more difficult. No teams there missing a piece as large as Bynum figures to be.

Re: Losing the Finals is bad for the future
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2008, 09:19:11 PM »

Online Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33645
  • Tommy Points: 1549
Hmmm .... Who would the Cavs and Lakers be most like on that list?

I think the Cavs are most like Phily. On the bright side for Cleveland I think Philadelphia's tour ended mostly out of bad management and Iverson's flaws which are both completely avoidable for the Cavs.

The Lakers are more difficult. No teams there missing a piece as large as Bynum figures to be.
I don't know if I'd put the Cavs in Philly territory.  Sure there are similarities, but Lebron is not only significantly younger than Iverson, he is also a much more complete player.  He really only needs a Pippen to his Jordan to win multiple championships.  I also don't see the Cavs run as over unless Lebron leaves. 

The Lakers will definately be interesting.  They are one of the few finals teams that lost the finals in the early part of their prime.  I think they could legitimately be the team that lost the finals that ends up winning a title with virtually the same supporting cast. 
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick

Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip