I'm also curious as to whether some of these Euro signings will be worth it for the clubs involved. Is a player like Carlos Delfino or Delonte West good enough to totally dominate the league they're playing in? While they bring an appreciably better chance of their teams winning a title, or in selling tickets?
I have no idea what the answers to those questions are. It will be interesting to see; I think if some of these role players don't pay immediate dividends, you could see this trend dry up fairly quickly.
Good questions to bring up, Roy. Just my opinion on the answers:
No, not even close. For starters, not even the best players in Europe can dominate a league. The rules and the style the game is played don't allow the kind of individual dominance one can see in the NBA: few ISO, few one-on-one plays, few high-usage rates. Even the way the minutes are alocated per player is different. Even guys like Sabonis, Kukoc, Bodiroga, Papaloukas, Parker, Siskauskas were more super-role players than the alpha type kind of player that usually dominates in the NBA. And guys like Delfino or Nachbar were never top players in Europe.
No. CSKA will easily destroy them once again in the domestic league. And clubs like Dynamo or Chimsky (a pun with Chelsea - Khimki, because of the way they behave in the market, overpaying everyone thanks to the money of their russian owners) don't even play in the Euroleague, but in a secondary competition, ULEB Cup).
No, european basketball is not so star-driven as the NBA. Supporters will buy tickets if the team is winning and playing well, disregarding who is in the roster. But for a club like Khimki, that don't even have a fanbase, this is not applicable: I had a chance of attending one of their games 2 years ago and there were about 1.500 fans in the stands. These guys are not making business, not even running non-profitable organizations like most European ball clubs are.
There's an excellent article on this issue by DraftExpress' Luis Fernandez that I strongly reccomend:
http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Thoughts-on-the-Euro-Fever-2971/Exactly my thoughts, with two minor disagreements:
- The greek powerhouses are generating revenue to pay for these contracts, mostly due to a recent huge TV rights and sponsorship deal. Last year Panathinaikos had a positive operating income. Oly may lose some money, and the ownership covers it, but it's not fair to put them in the same class of the Russian clubs. Greek clubs have big and fanatic fanbases.
- He forgets to mention the clubs from his own country and their responsibilty in this high-salaries trend. Barcelona has recently signed Navarro for €15 million/5 years and David Andersen (ouch, another player the Hawks could very well use, his draft rights belong to them) for a €2 million annual salary. Real Madrid has half-a-dozen of players making this kind of money. Tau's Splitter is making more money than almost every NBA player his age. A little of homerism from his part in these two points.