I agree that stats aren't the end all and be all, but ignoring them because they don't agree with you is no better. By your defintion, i'm supposed to agree with all your points, because there how it is.
yet all the points you make following your assertion that stats are a weak argument are in the eye of the beholder.
you base his decline in miami on thier team imploding, and the twolves you say are overrated. so, none of this is walkers fault, lets give him a free pass.
none of that proves anything, its your opinion. Some of it may be right, but that in no way makes it more valid, logical, or true than my assesment that walker is a player who is declining rapidly.
what you listed aren't qualifiers, thier bail outs. Your of course right that thier your opnion, and your entitled to them, but that doesn't mean that i;
"Fail to accept them, so be it"
Your arguments are no more valid than mine, simply because you said them and i didn't. whats your backup for saying jefferson isn't going to be elite? you have nothing more to base that on than i do in saying i think he'll be a force in the west for years to come.
also, your qoute at the end doesn't really affect my argument at all. i was and have been using stats as "support rather than illumination"
I stated my opnion, and then brought stats in to support it.
The point of that qoute is that stats on thier own aren't enough, not that stats are overrated, as was being implied.