The problem with Perkins being out is that Garnett has to guard Gasol. Perkins made a believer out of me because he denied Gasol good post position and forced him out to around 15 to 18 feet. I think the question Celtics fans have to ask themselves is who is capable of denying Gasol post position, while at the same time freeing up Garnett to guard Odom. I'd think that would be Glen Davis.
As a Laker fan, I'd like to see Scalabrine out there instead.
Why? PJ has the length, strength and experience to defend Gasol.
plus, guarding Gasol got KG in trouble. Gasol was also able to push KG back.
Also, with Odom covered by either guys that were to slow or to small, he got off. And that makes the rest of the Lakers offense so much more dangerous.
KG can shut down Odom, or slow down Gasol. I think shutting down Odom is the way to go. Let the other big men be physically aggressive. Use all three of them so even if they pick up fouls, there is still a big body to throw at him.
KG goes on Gasol if it is close down the stretch.
PJ and Powe did a poor job of denying Gasol good post position. When Gasol has good position, it is beneficial to the Lakers for a number of reasons.
1. Laker spacing improves, resulting in fewer broken plays and low percentage shots.
2. Gasol is able to crash the boards more effectively.
If the Laker spacing improves, and if Gasol is able to crash the boards effectively, then the Celtics will go small. Garnett can defend Gasol pretty well, but that means a mismatch is created when Posey has to keep Odom off the glass or out of the paint.
Why not keep PJ out there on Odom, you ask? Because that allows Odom to roam a little bit more and protect the interior. At least Posey can stretch the defense when he's out there.
And foul trouble hurt your team in the last game; they couldn't play as aggressively as they wanted to down the stretch.