Author Topic: Why Did FG%'s Used To Be So Low?  (Read 2078 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Why Did FG%'s Used To Be So Low?
« on: June 14, 2008, 03:09:06 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30921
  • Tommy Points: 3766
  • Yup
nickagneta said this in another thread:

Quote
6. Bill Sharman - the forgotten great often. the best pure shooter of his time who averaged 43-45% FG% in a time when the average FG% was probably in the mid 30's. And those were mostly outside shots.

Having looked at the stats from way back when I've always wondered why the FG% were always so low.  I didn't want to start a tangent in that thread.  But Nick, anyone, why?

Were players just worse shooters?  Was the D better?  Fewer dunks? Some combo.  What?
Yup

Re: Why Did FG%'s Used To Be So Low?
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2008, 03:18:25 PM »

Offline angryguy77

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7249
  • Tommy Points: 592
nickagneta said this in another thread:

Quote
6. Bill Sharman - the forgotten great often. the best pure shooter of his time who averaged 43-45% FG% in a time when the average FG% was probably in the mid 30's. And those were mostly outside shots.

Having looked at the stats from way back when I've always wondered why the FG% were always so low.  I didn't want to start a tangent in that thread.  But Nick, anyone, why?

Were players just worse shooters?  Was the D better?  Fewer dunks? Some combo.  What?

Too many slow white guys :o

Don't know if this is correct or not, but I would guess that they called the game according to the rules more than today. I don't think you would have been able to plam the ball and studder step which makes it harder to defend your guy  back then. But I think the advent of the dunk has something to do with it and the fact that the athletes today are quicker and can jump higher.
Still don't believe in Joe.

Re: Why Did FG%'s Used To Be So Low?
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2008, 03:27:12 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Players weren't as skilled back then. The level of commitment and training at a young age these days is ridiculous.

Watch old film. Players back then look incredibly awkward. Ray Allen would look like an alien playing in a game in the 50s or 60s due to both his beautiful jumper form and his smoothness going to the hoop.

Re: Why Did FG%'s Used To Be So Low?
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2008, 03:30:08 PM »

Offline angryguy77

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7249
  • Tommy Points: 592
Players weren't as skilled back then. The level of commitment and training at a young age these days is ridiculous.

Watch old film. Players back then look incredibly awkward. Ray Allen would look like an alien playing in a game in the 50s or 60s due to both his beautiful jumper form and his smoothness going to the hoop.

I'd give my left arm to see that. Just imagine 9 other guys watching in disbelief
Still don't believe in Joe.