I don't know who would be best guarding Rip, but I totally disagree with the notion that Rip would abuse Rondo. Rip relies on his quickness - Rondo is quicker. Rip is a jump shooter - Rondo has long arms to get a hand in Rip's face. I think Rondo would do well defending Rip. That said, it's not a game of one-on-one and I don't know that that is the best way to match up for 5-on-5.
Rip Hamilton spends more time in the post than Billups does. Why take Rondo off Billups because of Chauncey's post advantages to put him on the bigger player who spends more time in the post and is a better post player? That makes no sense.
Rondo is 6-1 and long, Rip is 6-7 and long with high release, quick release. He'll shoot the turnaround J out of the post that he loves all night every night. Rip's only one of the best shooters in the league so that lightly contested shot from about 10 feet probably won't matter ....
It's a recipe for disaster
well, i had to double check that stat (and according to nba.com, its true). there is no way that rip hamilton is really 6-7. no way. if hes an inch over 6-5 i would be surprised.
and thats besides the fact. even if he is 6-7, heck, lets make him 6-8! he plays like a 6-2 shooting guard. billups on the other hand is a very physical player who will post up opposing guards all day. billups plays like say, magic.
some small guys play like their much bigger. some big guys play like their much smaller (ugh! A walker is the best example).
If the celts best 5 this series is PP, KG, Posey, Perk, House/RR. then i would put PP on Rip, but not till the 4th qrt. and then Posey could guard Prince. but Prince is the "X" factor. hes a real match-up problem against any team.
With the exception of Rip, the rest of the detroit team is very physical. i think that celts like RR and Ray, who play soft, are going to have a very difficult time on both sides of the ball.