CelticsStrong
Around the League => Transaction Ideas and Rumors => Topic started by: snowball on February 11, 2013, 02:29:54 PM
-
would you do it ?
-
Chandler and Kidd help us now.
Banner 18
-
Why would the Knicks?
No, I wouldn't do it.
-
NY gets a PG for the future
they can move Felton later for something else.
Celtics get a real Center
NY gets Bass a solid player they can use now
C's get Kidd a solid backup to Bradley.
perfect
-
NY gets a PG for the future
they can move Felton later for something else.
Celtics get a real Center
NY gets Bass a solid player they can use now
C's get Kidd a solid backup to Bradley.
perfect
They don't want to move Felton. They like Felton.
-
Knicks wouldnt do it in a million years. Chandler is the main reason why they're considered "contenders" this year.
And they know it...
-
The Knicks believe they can compete right now.
Why would they move the starting C and one of their best reserves for a PG that is out for the season?
-
Definitely a win now move for us...a good one at that but the knicks are more of a contender then us right now...why trade for a pg out for the year
delusional
-
this trade idea is so ridiculous
-
snowballs chance in ...
-
an "idea" must result from some level of rational thought...
-
nah, i'll stop.
-
I'm going to tread by the ridiculous and ludicrous trade idea.
But why do people think that an injured, out for a season pg (an acquired taste one at that) would net a legit big, let alone a arguably top 10 one. Centers are scarce nowadays. Why do you think folks are drooling over a possible, but eventually ill-fated return of Greg Oden.
-
It is tough to see the snow fight the artic. Usually they go so well together.
-
It is tough to see the snow fight the artic. Usually they go so well together.
;D
-
knicks would never do this
-
not sure we get enough. what about
Bass + Melo
-for-
Anthony + Chandler
NYK get two players for their two players, we get #18.
-
knicks would never do this
not sure we get enough.
HmmMMMmmmmMMMMMmmmmmMMMMMMmmmmmmmMMMMMMM1!!1one!1!
Why would they trade an All-Star, top-3, DPOY in a hard position to fill, with a veteran steal PG who has great chemistry in the team... for an injured PG and an OK PF?
They have a chance at a championship and they're not gonna give it up THAT easily
-
not sure we get enough. what about
Bass + Melo
-for-
Anthony + Chandler
NYK get two players for their two players, we get #18.
Celtics would have to say no. Jeff Green can't be the third string SF.
-
knicks would never do this
not sure we get enough.
HmmMMMmmmmMMMMMmmmmmMMMMMMmmmmmmmMMMMMMM1!!1one!1!
Why would they trade an All-Star, top-3, DPOY in a hard position to fill, with a veteran steal PG who has great chemistry in the team... for an injured PG and an OK PF?
They have a chance at a championship and they're not gonna give it up THAT easily
sorry dude, forgot to use the sarcasm font..
(+1 wdleehi)
-
What about straight up Melo-for-Melo? ;)
-
not sure we get enough. what about
Bass + Melo
-for-
Anthony + Chandler
NYK get two players for their two players, we get #18.
Celtics would have to say no. Jeff Green can't be the third string SF.
Melo has been playing well at PF recently...
-
Too bad we didn't trade Ray Allen's 10 mill. expiring deal to Dallas for a S + T of Tyson Chandler back in 2011 after the lockout.
Chandler and KG's interior defense would have pretty much won a title by itself.
-
Too bad we didn't trade Ray Allen's 10 mill. expiring deal to Dallas for a S + T of Tyson Chandler back in 2011 after the lockout.
Chandler and KG's interior defense would have pretty much won a title by itself.
That would be ridiculous, but Dallas wouldn't have done that, would they?
-
Haha funny. Knicks laugh at us.
-
Too bad we didn't trade Ray Allen's 10 mill. expiring deal to Dallas for a S + T of Tyson Chandler back in 2011 after the lockout.
Chandler and KG's interior defense would have pretty much won a title by itself.
That would be ridiculous, but Dallas wouldn't have done that, would they?
Sure. They ended up just sign and trading him to NY for a Trade Exception. They then used that Trade Exception AND a first round pick to acquire Lamar Odom. And before Odom was available they were the third team that was going to take Jermaine O'Neal so we could get David West in a S+T.
Ray Allen on an expiring deal > then losing a pick to get Odom > JO
The Celts fell out of the David West running when the New Orleans Hornets couldn’t find a place to send Jermaine O’Neal (Lamar Odom going from the Los Angeles Kings to the Dallas Mavericks got in the way). New Orleans was looking for a another trade partner, but the Indiana Pacers stepped in with a two-year, $20 million deal for West, who received much more annually than the C’s were offering.
Besides, the Hornets have a bigger issue on their plate in the form of Chris Paul. New Orleans was reportedly looking to the Los Angeles Clippers yesterday for a deal, but the Celts could still get back in the running for the guard according to two sources.
http://www.stateoftheceltics.com/2011/12/why-david-west-didnt-land-with-celtics.html
At the time I think Ainge was weary of giving that kind of investment to Chandler (Over 30 yrs old with injury history) just like Cuban was. He also probably didn't want to break up the big 4.
This was linked to the Herald but the story has been archived. Obviously they meant the Lakers and not the Kings..
http://bostonherald.com//sports/celtics_nba/boston_celtics/2011/12/david_west_changes_direction
-
What about straight up Melo-for-Melo? ;)
Salaries don't match, otherwise it's a no-brainer for the Knicks :P You get more of Melo -- more inches, more pounds, and more Samba.
-
These trade ideas are more of a joke than my current love life. Jeez
-
Knicks wouldn't do this at all.
-
Too bad we didn't trade Ray Allen's 10 mill. expiring deal to Dallas for a S + T of Tyson Chandler back in 2011 after the lockout.
Chandler and KG's interior defense would have pretty much won a title by itself.
I wanted to trade KG for T.Chandler at that time.
Dallas keeps the 2012 cap flexibility with KG's expiring contract + gets a star player who can aid their title defense.
While Boston gets a younger big man who allows them to rebuild on the run. I also wanted to go after Rudy Gay with Paul Pierce. Rebuild around Rondo, Gay and Tyson.
-
Are you saying there's no way the Knicks would
trade Tyson Chandler without us having to give up
KG or PP ? I doubt that.
Are you saying Felton is as good as Rondo ?
we could throw in Fab and/or Hollins.
BOS trades: Rondo, Bass, Collins, Fab Melo
(Lee interchangeable)
NYK trades: Chandler, Kidd
etc.
-
Is good for us but NYK can not give you Chandler