CelticsStrong

Celtics Basketball => Celtics Talk => Topic started by: JHTruth on October 08, 2012, 11:23:22 PM

Title: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: JHTruth on October 08, 2012, 11:23:22 PM
Please explain our love affair with this guy.

Pathetic shot selection, poor IQ.

Plus this guy is looking for Kobe money after this year. What a joke, stay far far away from this guy..
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: bucknersrevenge on October 08, 2012, 11:38:48 PM
I don't know about a love affair but the guy simply has talent. People want to throw out the baby with the bathwater when it comes to Smith because he takes too many long 2's and doesn't shoot them well enough. If Smith were on this team he would be an outstanding defensive weapon who between he and KG could erase most mistakes. Offensively, he's a solid post up guy. He's an underrated passer who is very unselfish. He's excellent in transition and he would probably walk on to this team the best rebounder we have. There are lots of reasons to want this guy and that's before you get to he and Rondo being tight. The problem as it has been anytime the discussing of him comes up, does Smith upgrade this team relative to what we'd need to give up in a trade to get him. On that I have some doubts. It would take something like Bass, Green, a 1st rnder and either Melo or Sully just to make salaries match right and that just seems like too much.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: rondohondo on October 08, 2012, 11:43:26 PM
Disagree , he averaged 18ppg and 10rebs and 17ppg and 13.6 rebs 5 asts in the playoffs last year. He is an elite defender at the PF position(averages 2blks and 1 stl for his career) with legit length 6'10 (Bass,Green and Sullinger are all undersized PF'S). He would be an amazing running mate for Rondo and would make a very good defense great while solving our rebounding troubles.

Imagine a starting lineup of Rondo,Bradley,PP,Smith and KG . That D would be locking teams down nightly.

He has never had a legit PG to get him the ball which explains his poor shot selection. He would benefit greatly from playing with elite passers like Rondo and KG.

I don't understand why money would be a concern, we are over the cap for the next 2 years anyways and we are going for a title right now. IMO Smith strongly improves our chance of winning a title this year.


I would trade Bass and Green and pick for smith if that's what it takes.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: indeedproceed on October 08, 2012, 11:50:18 PM
He is better offensively, defensively, and with more big game experience than anyone of our Frontcourt players other than KG, plus he already has a better rapport with Rondo than anyone aside from KG and Pierce. He would improve our team considerably, and would on paper put us on par with Miami. He would be a considerable upgrade.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: manl_lui on October 08, 2012, 11:52:02 PM
Disagree , he averaged 18ppg and 10rebs and 17ppg and 13.6 rebs 5 asts in the playoffs last year. He is an elite defender at the PF position(averages 2blks and 1 stl for his career) with legit length 6'10 (Bass,Green and Sullinger are all undersized PF'S). He would be an amazing running mate for Rondo and would make a very good defense great while solving our rebounding troubles.

Imagine a starting lineup of Rondo,Bradley,PP,Smith and KG . That D would be locking teams down nightly.

He has never had a legit PG to get him the ball which explains his poor shot selection. He would benefit greatly from playing with elite passers like Rondo and KG.

I don't understand why money would be a concern, we are over the cap for the next 2 years anyways and we are going for a title right now. IMO Smith strongly improves our chance of winning a title this year.


I would trade Bass and Green and pick for smith if that's what it takes.

^this but I really don't want to give up too much for Smith. Besides we have until February to decide where we are going with this team. If Sully really pans out and played like the way he did in the pre-seasons so far, then Bass is definitely expendable. I don't want to get rid of Green though cuz we need him to back up Pierce. I know salaries don't match but, I don't want to see us giving up Rondo, Pierce, Bradley, or Green for anyone that's going to be a role player on the Cs
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: kg is king on October 09, 2012, 12:47:02 AM
J Smoove will definitely upgrade our team. Just based on facts alone, I'll take a guy 19 and 10 guy on my team with open arms. Now moving on from facts, he's also an elite defender, which is an area that most people think he succeeds in because of his athleticism. The truth is Smith has the hops, the quickness, and also the skills of a dominant defensive big. For one he's an excellent pick-and-roll defender. He has the length and the strength to match up against other bigs and also the quickness to guard wings. I wouldn't mind having him and KG anchoring the low post. Both of them will be able to communicate and call out signals. There's no other Celtic that has his level of talent and versatility on the defensive end, aside from KG (who's not as versatile on switches as he once was). Offensively, he's a decent player on the block and a nightmare in transition.

Bottom line is this. Our team is very good as currently constructed, with depth in all 5 positions. But when the playoffs start, starters will be asked to play longer minutes. Lebron, Wade, and Bosh will all play 40+ minutes a game and I can't imagine our second unit, as good as they might be, will be able to hang with the Heat Big 3. Adding Smith gives us star power, a point that I've mentioned numerous times in previous posts. A team with good depth will win regular season titles, but not championships (the Mavs of 2011 being one exception). Heck, just look at the Spurs these last couple of years. Those Spurs teams were deep, but when the playoffs came around, their bench couldn't compete with OKC or Memphis for that matter. I'd take Smith playing 40+ minutes in the playoffs over playing Bass 25 and Sully 23 all day.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: ummidkme on October 09, 2012, 12:51:19 AM
With all positives already being said about Smith I still don't understand the love affair. Lets at least see how the team as it is currently configured operates. If they have a ridiculous record by mid-season roll with what you got. Plus, to get Smith right now does cost way too much, especially since he can be available next off-season. Why give up so much for no real reason. We don't need Smith as of yet. That being said if we could give up Wilcox, Collins, Joseph, Christmas, Bass a couple of picks and money to get Smith I would do that. I am in no way giving up Sullinger, Green, Avery or Melo as a prospect.

To quote mmmmm on the Most complete Celtic team?

Quote
But trading Bass AND Green is overkill on the salary matching.

To bring Smith's salary in (balloons to 15M on trade clause) we need to send at least 10M.  But we need to send a little more than that to stay under the luxury tax threshold - so ~11M or so should do it.

Green plus Bass is 14M+ - so that's overkill.  Plus, while we can afford to trade Bass because we have depth at PF AND the player we get back (Smith) would be a PF, however trading Green robs us of our SF depth behind Pierce, which is critical.   I don't think we can afford to do that.  We need Pierce to be fresh come playoffs.

Bass plus Lee is 11M.   That trade works better for matching the money plus once Bradley is back then we have more depth at SG to trade from.   I.E., Lee becomes a tradable luxury.   Yes, Atlanta has a surplus of SGs of its own right now.  To make this work, you probably need a third team that would take either Lee or someone from ATL's roster in exchange for something ATL needs in order to make the deal work.   Sweeten the deal with draft picks.

The net would be the C's getting Smith and Atlanta getting Bass + Lee/whatever + picks.   ATL has to take some sort of deal like that at some point or watch Smith walk at the end of the year.

I am also hesitant about trading Lee. I'd like to see how Avery comes back from surgery and holds up during extended play.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: rondohondo on October 09, 2012, 01:05:21 AM
With all positives already being said about Smith I still don't understand the love affair. Lets at least see how the team as it is currently configured operates. If they have a ridiculous record by mid-season roll with what you got. Plus, to get Smith right now does cost way too much, especially since he can be available next off-season. Why give up so much for no real reason. We don't need Smith as of yet. That being said if we could give up Wilcox, Collins, Joseph, Christmas, Bass a couple of picks and money to get Smith I would do that. I am in no way giving up Sullinger, Green, Avery or Melo as a prospect.

To quote mmmmm on the Most complete Celtic team?

Quote
But trading Bass AND Green is overkill on the salary matching.

To bring Smith's salary in (balloons to 15M on trade clause) we need to send at least 10M.  But we need to send a little more than that to stay under the luxury tax threshold - so ~11M or so should do it.

Green plus Bass is 14M+ - so that's overkill.  Plus, while we can afford to trade Bass because we have depth at PF AND the player we get back (Smith) would be a PF, however trading Green robs us of our SF depth behind Pierce, which is critical.   I don't think we can afford to do that.  We need Pierce to be fresh come playoffs.

Bass plus Lee is 11M.   That trade works better for matching the money plus once Bradley is back then we have more depth at SG to trade from.   I.E., Lee becomes a tradable luxury.   Yes, Atlanta has a surplus of SGs of its own right now.  To make this work, you probably need a third team that would take either Lee or someone from ATL's roster in exchange for something ATL needs in order to make the deal work.   Sweeten the deal with draft picks.

The net would be the C's getting Smith and Atlanta getting Bass + Lee/whatever + picks.   ATL has to take some sort of deal like that at some point or watch Smith walk at the end of the year.

I am also hesitant about trading Lee. I'd like to see how Avery comes back from surgery and holds up during extended play.

wow you're really drinking that green cool-aid. You wouldn't give up Sully Lee or Melo to get Smith? He's an all-star level talent who's only 26, but you would rather have unproven prospects who at the full potential won't even be as good as Smith is already?

I like Sully alot,but smith is already close to being a 20/10 guy with elite defense and athleticism...

no chance atlanta is going to trade him for only those players anyways, it would likely take Bradley or Green along with Bass and filler to have a shot at landing him. I am hesitant to give up Bradley, but Green and Bass I would be wiling to send out for an all-star talent to team up with Rondo for the next 10 years.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Celtics18 on October 09, 2012, 01:56:55 AM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen. 
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: nostar on October 09, 2012, 02:45:11 AM
We simply can't trade Green without some suitable SF replacement. Courtney Lee can't effectively defend the SF position and unless you guys want to try Josh Howard or Pietrus (neither of whom are talking the minimum I hear) then we need to get a SF back in any Green trade. Joseph isn't ready to be a role player on a championship team and I know that because in the 11 minutes he's played on this team against euro-league talent he's looked lost.

Oh and let's not forget we're probably going to have a legitimate 10 man rotation once we get healthy this season. That is pretty out of character for the Celtics. To end last season we had an 8 man rotation. Having a lot of the all-star talent on our team be primarily on the back ends of their careers means we have to be deep to let them play well when they are in. You guys will see what happens to teams that shoot the moon on older players when the Knicks fall apart mid-season. I hear Camby is already injured.

If we can get Smith great. I don't wanna give up any of our starters to do so, and we can't give up Green either. I'd be willing to go over the tax line (which we already do) but we're bound by the 74.1M apron after using the MLE on Jason Terry. Ainge worked miracles to pull off this roster and I'm pretty sure we're the front runners to win the East.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: j804 on October 09, 2012, 03:16:34 AM
I don't get the fascination with Smith on here
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: ummidkme on October 09, 2012, 03:47:55 AM
Quote
wow you're really drinking that green cool-aid. You wouldn't give up Sully Lee or Melo to get Smith? He's an all-star level talent who's only 26, but you would rather have unproven prospects who at the full potential won't even be as good as Smith is already?

I like Sully alot,but smith is already close to being a 20/10 guy with elite defense and athleticism...

no chance atlanta is going to trade him for only those players anyways, it would likely take Bradley or Green along with Bass and filler to have a shot at landing him. I am hesitant to give up Bradley, but Green and Bass I would be wiling to send out for an all-star talent to team up with Rondo for the next 10 years.

If you call cool-aid having trust in a team yes. We haven't had a single real game and people are willing to throw pieces out there when we have mid-season at the latest to start thinking about a revised roster. Like I said I'd love Smith but the pieces you would have to give up are ridiculous. I'd say Smith is very close to being 20/10 and that makes him worthy of a trade if and this is a big if you don't trade Green our only backup SF. If Avery is good then I'd give up Bass, Lee, Wilcox, Collins, Joseph and whatever else ATL needs to feel good. If Danny wants to include Melo I'm fine with that as well, just because I see potential in our rooks doesn't mean their untradeable. I just think people are drinking their fantasy basketball cool-aid when before the season begins they want trades done.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: arambone on October 09, 2012, 06:12:06 AM
the celtics are blessed to have so many players that are signed to bargain deals.

Sully is a way better value than smith, and will be even more so over the next few years on this rookie contract.

I also like keeping rondo on a short leash. Having smith on the team would give rondo more power. Imagine rondo and smith together protesting some team decision with lackluster play.

It was only 2 years ago that rondo tanked in protest of perk being traded. Having a high paid, talented lackey around would bring out the worst in rondo when things dont go rondos way.

Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: mctyson on October 09, 2012, 07:04:48 AM
Please explain our love affair with this guy.

He's one of the best defensive power forwards on the planet.  Putting him next to KG would give us an all-time defensive frontcourt.

Combine that with Rondo and AB, and you could have 4 First Team All NBA defenders in your starting 5.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: 2short on October 09, 2012, 07:07:47 AM
the celtics are blessed to have so many players that are signed to bargain deals.

Sully is a way better value than smith, and will be even more so over the next few years on this rookie contract.

I also like keeping rondo on a short leash. Having smith on the team would give rondo more power. Imagine rondo and smith together protesting some team decision with lackluster play.

It was only 2 years ago that rondo tanked in protest of perk being traded. Having a high paid, talented lackey around would bring out the worst in rondo when things dont go rondos way.
you feel rondo tanked  ???
the guy who plays without speaking about any minor injury even when young, the guy who dives for a loose ball through someone's legs, the guy who played with a dislocated arm
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: bfrombleacher on October 09, 2012, 07:17:34 AM
the celtics are blessed to have so many players that are signed to bargain deals.

Sully is a way better value than smith, and will be even more so over the next few years on this rookie contract.

I also like keeping rondo on a short leash. Having smith on the team would give rondo more power. Imagine rondo and smith together protesting some team decision with lackluster play.

It was only 2 years ago that rondo tanked in protest of perk being traded. Having a high paid, talented lackey around would bring out the worst in rondo when things dont go rondos way.
you feel rondo tanked  ???
the guy who plays without speaking about any minor injury even when young, the guy who dives for a loose ball through someone's legs, the guy who played with a dislocated arm

Chris Paul would have played with both hips dislocated.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: SHAQATTACK on October 09, 2012, 08:51:22 AM
I'm a fan of Smith and I think he would be a good fit and upgrade.

Not sure , I do it getting rid of certain players would be correct move at this point.

I wouldn't want to make the team thin on the bench like the Heat/LA , or give up to much of the future lineup . like AB and Sully.  Green is Pierces backup. Trade off all our bench , then we have the situation Like LA, of older guys having to play too many minutes and risk of injury.

probally best to wait and see how the Celtics play with Wilcox and AB back in the lineup

rather hold our cards and see what we got.


Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Bankshot on October 09, 2012, 09:00:14 AM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen.

I agree, except I would leave Melo out of that list if it would help to get Smith.

I know Smith has a bad shot selection, but I don't see why he can't improve his shot selection.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: rondohondo on October 09, 2012, 09:03:32 AM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen.

I agree, except I would leave Melo out of that list if it would help to get Smith.

I know Smith has a bad shot selection, but I don't see why he can't improve his shot selection.
Green or Bradley would have to be involved IMO, no way the Hawks are giving Smith away for Bass and Junk. The guy is approaching being a 20/10 PF with legit size and athleticism .
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: dreamgreen on October 09, 2012, 09:18:02 AM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen.

I agree, except I would leave Melo out of that list if it would help to get Smith.

I know Smith has a bad shot selection, but I don't see why he can't improve his shot selection.
Green or Bradley would have to be involved IMO, no way the Hawks are giving Smith away for Bass and Junk. The guy is approaching being a 20/10 PF with legit size and athleticism .

I would be willing to give up Bradley. He is a small SG with injury problems, I'm worried about him being able to make it through a full season. IMO we have to think about possibly moving him when his stock is high.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: wdleehi on October 09, 2012, 09:20:03 AM
He is an improvement offensively and defensively.


My issue has never been with the talent.  It has been with the offensive game he falls in love with and (the big issue) the amount of money he is and will likely get in the future. 
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: mgent on October 09, 2012, 09:22:00 AM
Can anybody here name a defense that has ever existed better than Rondo/Bradley/Pierce/Smith/KG?

Can anybody here name a defense period that has featured 5 elite defenders in the starting lineup?

Better than 08, better than 04.  I'd like to see that team vs. Russell.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Clench123 on October 09, 2012, 09:36:49 AM
How about Bass, Wilcox, Melo, Kris Joseph, Christmas, and two draft picks for Smith.  Besides Bass and Wilcox, those other ones are scrubs that won't be on the floor much anyways.  And we can afford to do without Bass and Wilcox. 

To people who are saying they don't understand the love affair, do you know how scary we'll be with a starting line-up of Rondo, Pierce, KG, Smith, and Bradley?  With that line up, #18 is guaranteed
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: wdleehi on October 09, 2012, 09:45:40 AM
How about Bass, Wilcox, Melo, Kris Joseph, and two draft picks for Smith.  Besides Bass and Wilcox, those other ones are scrubs that won't be on the floor much anyways.  And we can afford to do without Bass and Wilcox. 

To people who are saying they don't understand the love affair, do you know how scary we'll be with a starting line-up of Rondo, Pierce, KG, Smith, and Bradley?  With that line up, #18 is guaranteed


Why does Atlanta make this trade?

Bass is a good role player and Wilcox was serviceable as a backup.  How does that equal near all-star level on the last year of a contract? 
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: MBunge on October 09, 2012, 10:07:55 AM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen.

I agree, except I would leave Melo out of that list if it would help to get Smith.

I know Smith has a bad shot selection, but I don't see why he can't improve his shot selection.

Because he's been in the league 8 years and it's no better now than when he started?

I can understand the appeal of Smith.  He's a great talent and young enough to pair with Rondo for another 5+ years, but I think folks are underestimating the trouble that comes with a guy who's going to turn 27 and still plays stupid on the court.

Mike
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: aporel#18 on October 09, 2012, 10:29:56 AM
Josh Smith is a beast, but I'd rather let this current team play the year out, and see what happens.

I wouldn't trade Green while his stock is at its lowest. Sully and Melo are keepers, and Bradley also. Courtney Lee and Bass would be the pieces during the season. In the offseason, we'll see.

I like this team and I think Green/Bass/Sully combined are more valuable than having Josh Smith. Atlanta would ask for at least the three of them, plus draft picks. Would you give so many assets for Josh Smith? Me neither.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: mctyson on October 09, 2012, 11:30:32 AM
My issue has never been with the talent.  It has been with the offensive game he falls in love with and (the big issue) the amount of money he is and will likely get in the future.

My guess is that if we ever do trade for Smith, it will be one of 2 scenarios:  our team is a legit championship contender and we will take him for a 3 month rental, or our team (for whatever reason) is not able to compete at the level we think they can, we trade KG and Pierce, and rebuild with Smith and Rondo.

I don't put a high probability on the latter scenario but it could happen
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Moranis on October 09, 2012, 11:31:35 AM
How about Bass, Wilcox, Melo, Kris Joseph, and two draft picks for Smith.  Besides Bass and Wilcox, those other ones are scrubs that won't be on the floor much anyways.  And we can afford to do without Bass and Wilcox. 

To people who are saying they don't understand the love affair, do you know how scary we'll be with a starting line-up of Rondo, Pierce, KG, Smith, and Bradley?  With that line up, #18 is guaranteed


Why does Atlanta make this trade?

Bass is a good role player and Wilcox was serviceable as a backup.  How does that equal near all-star level on the last year of a contract?
well they would get Melo and 2 other picks, which makes it not a terrible trade.

I think it needs to be Sullinger and Bradley.

Something like this Atlanta and Boston both might do

Bass, Wilcox, Sullinger, Bradley, and a 2nd (maybe a 1st)

for

Smith
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Who on October 09, 2012, 11:43:22 AM
Josh Smith is 6-8 to 6-9 and weighs 225 to 230lbs.

He is an undersized power forward (undersized quick four).
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: More Banners on October 09, 2012, 12:02:18 PM
I just don't see a deal for Josh Smith that's worth doing.

I really like the current roster.  We have enough and then some at every position.  Not worth screwing with a great thing.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: saltlover on October 09, 2012, 12:27:48 PM
I doubt Josh Smith comes here.  If he does, it will be next offseason.

I think the Celtics would be a great team with Josh Smith.  I think they are a great team now.  Getting Josh Smith for this season seems unnecessary, but getting him in the off-season for several years would improve the franchise in the long run.

I am pledging to not talk about Josh Smith again until June.  I encourage everyone else to do the same (except, of course, when we play the Hawks.)
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: pearljammer10 on October 09, 2012, 12:31:34 PM
Josh smith would significantly make this team better. He would instantly be the second best defender on the team behind Garnett and playing alongside Garnett might make him the best defender on the team. He averaged better numbers then anyone on our team last year. We would become a significantly better defensive team, hard to believe, and would be able to run much more. I love bass but smith would be a huge huge huge upgrade over him in the starting lineup.

Imagine the starting five of rondo Bradley pierce smith and kg getting turn overs and running the break. We could even play super small ball with a stellar line up of rondo terry lee green and smith. Grabbing smith would bring us from number 5 or 6 contender to 1 or 2.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: snively on October 09, 2012, 12:41:45 PM
I think Smith + Rondo would work beautifully together offensively - very similar to the Nash/Marion duo that was so potent in Phoenix.  The Smith/KG frontcourt pairing is also extremely appealing.

Very difficult to construct a deal that would be pleasing to Atlanta though.  If Jeff Green can play his way into positive trade value, maybe. 
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Kane3387 on October 09, 2012, 01:19:38 PM
What about a Gary Payton and Shawn Kemp comparison? Smith is only 5 lbs lighter and 1 inch smaller then Kemp was in his prime.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Chris on October 09, 2012, 01:22:19 PM
I think Smith + Rondo would work beautifully together offensively - very similar to the Nash/Marion duo that was so potent in Phoenix.  The Smith/KG frontcourt pairing is also extremely appealing.

Very difficult to construct a deal that would be pleasing to Atlanta though.  If Jeff Green can play his way into positive trade value, maybe.

I think there is a HUGE difference offensively with Nash/Marion from Rondo/Smith, because of the dramatically different shooting abilities.  But, defensively, Rondo and Smith would be a scary combination.

I agree that there just aren't many deals that make much sense for both teams though.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Kane3387 on October 09, 2012, 01:28:09 PM
How about Bass, Wilcox, Melo, Kris Joseph, and two draft picks for Smith.  Besides Bass and Wilcox, those other ones are scrubs that won't be on the floor much anyways.  And we can afford to do without Bass and Wilcox. 

To people who are saying they don't understand the love affair, do you know how scary we'll be with a starting line-up of Rondo, Pierce, KG, Smith, and Bradley?  With that line up, #18 is guaranteed


Why does Atlanta make this trade?

Bass is a good role player and Wilcox was serviceable as a backup.  How does that equal near all-star level on the last year of a contract?

I think the most realistic trade we would do for Smith would be the following:

Brandon Bass, Fab Melo, and Avery Bradley (picks and fillers might need to be added)

We aren't giving up Both Bass and Sullinger. I also think Sullinger will evolve as our most valuable rookie contract deal. He's in the first year of his deal where as Bradley will be up for an extension soon. We have 21+ mill committed to Rondo, Lee, and Jet over the next 3+ years. Where is the money for AB going to come from?

Bradley and Fab give Atlanta potential and cheap salary. They can eventually compliment Horford. Bass is a fair deal that can realistically be moved later on, but 6 mill isn't a bad deal for a guy like Bass.

I think that is the best deal Atlanta would get from us.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Kane3387 on October 09, 2012, 01:31:53 PM
Josh Smith is 6-8 to 6-9 and weighs 225 to 230lbs.

He is an undersized power forward (undersized quick four).

Shawn Kemp was 6'10" and 230. He was pretty good in Seattle. The league is smaller then it was in the 90s and early 2000s. Smith can play the 4 based on his size. His shot selection and offensive skill set are what make people feel he is "positionless" at neither being a 3 or a 4.

Playing with Rondo and passers like KG and Pierce can improve that efficiency.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: ManUp on October 09, 2012, 01:33:05 PM
I also want Kobe money on my next contract, but as we know you don't always get what you want. Smith is likely to get paid close to 70 mill on a 5 year deal, fair value imo. He's a dynamic double double big in his prime who has helped lead his team to the play-offs multiple times. He has to create a lot of his own offense with the Hawks, so his efficiency probably jumps playing next to Rondo. I would love him on this team.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Kane3387 on October 09, 2012, 01:43:09 PM
Quote
I think the most realistic trade we would do for Smith would be the following:

Brandon Bass, Fab Melo, and Avery Bradley (picks and fillers might need to be added)

We aren't giving up Both Bass and Sullinger. I also think Sullinger will evolve as our most valuable rookie contract deal. He's in the first year of his deal where as Bradley will be up for an extension soon. We have 21+ mill committed to Rondo, Lee, and Jet over the next 3+ years. Where is the money for AB going to come from?

Bradley and Fab give Atlanta potential and cheap salary. They can eventually compliment Horford. Bass is a fair deal that can realistically be moved later on, but 6 mill isn't a bad deal for a guy like Bass.

I think that is the best deal Atlanta would get from us.

According to the trade machine on ESPN the Celtics would have to trade an additional $1,663,450 in filler to make the deal I proposed above.

This is because we used the MLE on Jet. Trade Machine tells you this if you do a deal with the salary they have in there for Darko along with Avery and Fab for Smith. Then you just do the math. It says you have to get rid of an extra 2,435,450 but you subtract from that the 772,000 that is the difference between Darko and Bass.

Thus at 1,663,4450 you would have to add a Jason Collins and Chris Wilcox to the deal. I believe Bass, Wilcox, Collins, Bradley, and Melo would provide the salary to get Smith in Green with our cap restraints. Picks would probably be swapped also.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: rondohondo on October 09, 2012, 01:52:16 PM
How about Bass, Wilcox, Melo, Kris Joseph, and two draft picks for Smith.  Besides Bass and Wilcox, those other ones are scrubs that won't be on the floor much anyways.  And we can afford to do without Bass and Wilcox. 

To people who are saying they don't understand the love affair, do you know how scary we'll be with a starting line-up of Rondo, Pierce, KG, Smith, and Bradley?  With that line up, #18 is guaranteed


Why does Atlanta make this trade?

Bass is a good role player and Wilcox was serviceable as a backup.  How does that equal near all-star level on the last year of a contract?

I think the most realistic trade we would do for Smith would be the following:

Brandon Bass, Fab Melo, and Avery Bradley (picks and fillers might need to be added)

We aren't giving up Both Bass and Sullinger. I also think Sullinger will evolve as our most valuable rookie contract deal. He's in the first year of his deal where as Bradley will be up for an extension soon. We have 21+ mill committed to Rondo, Lee, and Jet over the next 3+ years. Where is the money for AB going to come from?

Bradley and Fab give Atlanta potential and cheap salary. They can eventually compliment Horford. Bass is a fair deal that can realistically be moved later on, but 6 mill isn't a bad deal for a guy like Bass.

I think that is the best deal Atlanta would get from us.

Here's a few trades I could see that could work for both teams.

Bos sends: Green, Sully, pick or Melo(plus filler)
ATL Sends: Josh Smith

Bos sends: Bass, Bradley, Melo or pick(plus filler)
Atl sends: Josh Smith

I would rather do the 2nd trade because we have good depth at the SG spot and we get to keep Jeff Green as the backup SF.


1st trade would leave us a roster of
PG: Rondo    / JET
SG: Bradley  / Lee
SF: PP       / Pietrus? Josh Howard?
PF: Smith    / Bass
 C: KG       / Darko


2nd trade would leave us with a roster of

PG: Rondo   / JET
SG: Lee     / Vet Min
SF: PP      / Green
PF: Smith   / Sully
 C: KG      / Darko

still very deep rosters with only void being a SG or SF off the bench. Josh Howard and Pietrus are still out there...
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Who on October 09, 2012, 02:11:55 PM
What about a Gary Payton and Shawn Kemp comparison? Smith is only 5 lbs lighter and 1 inch smaller then Kemp was in his prime.

More like Jason Kidd and Kenyon Martin
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: indeedproceed on October 09, 2012, 02:14:53 PM
What about a Gary Payton and Shawn Kemp comparison? Smith is only 5 lbs lighter and 1 inch smaller then Kemp was in his prime.

More like Jason Kidd and Kenyon Martin

They seemed to do okay though, right?
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Who on October 09, 2012, 02:20:06 PM
I doubt Atlanta would be all that interested in Avery Bradley.

They already have Jeff Teague there as well as Devin Harris and Lou Williams at the point guard / combo guard positions. Plus, they just drafted John Jenkins, another 6-4 guard. That backcourt looks pretty packed already. Lou Williams on a multi-year deal. Jenkins beginning a rookie scale contract and Jeff Teague their PG of the future.

-----------------------------------------

I also think Avery Bradley really benefits from having a creator like Rondo to play off of. His splits with Rondo on and off the court show a large disparity. Atlanta has no offensive weapon for Bradley to play off of. Not a creative PG or a playmaking wing like Joe Johnson.

Unless Avery shows more shot-creation abilities, I think he'll be seen more as a finishing piece to a team than a piece you build around .... which is what Atlanta will be looking for post Josh Smith.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Who on October 09, 2012, 02:46:18 PM
Josh Smith is 6-8 to 6-9 and weighs 225 to 230lbs.

He is an undersized power forward (undersized quick four).

Shawn Kemp was 6'10" and 230. He was pretty good in Seattle. The league is smaller then it was in the 90s and early 2000s. Smith can play the 4 based on his size. His shot selection and offensive skill set are what make people feel he is "positionless" at neither being a 3 or a 4.

Playing with Rondo and passers like KG and Pierce can improve that efficiency.

Josh Smith has a position. He is combo forward who is best off as an undersized quick four but can also play some small forward as a power three. A PF/SF. Shawn Kemp was a different type of weapon; an undersized finesse based center / power based power forward. A C/PF. Kemp could play either position dependent on what style of play his team wanted to utilize (speed or power). 

Shawn Kemp is more comparable (in terms of position) to an Amare Stoudemire (or Hakeem Olajuwon) type of player whilst Josh Smith is more comparable to an Andrei Kirilenko (or Shawn Marion comparison above) type of player.

---------------------------------------------------

Shawn Kemp was also 240-245lbs during his best years in Seattle. The 230lbs was from early in his career when he first came into the league.

Josh Smith also came in at a lower weight (220lbs) and then beefed up. He was up to around 250lbs two seasons ago and was at 240lbs prior to that ... but then dropped the weight because it wasn't good weight. He (correctly) felt it was holding his game back. He got back down to 225lbs last season and had the best year of his career (with significantly room for more improvement). Allows him more positional versatility and better enables him to out-quick his opponent at PF.

Besides a strength advantage, Kemp was also taller and significantly longer. Josh Smith's reach is about average for a PF whilst Kemp's was more in line with a center. Just a bigger body than Smith has.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: celticmania on October 09, 2012, 02:53:45 PM
My Trade Idea:

Celtics Recieve:
Josh Smith

Hawks Recieve:
Avery Bradley
Fab Melo
Brandon Bass
Celtics 1st pick
Celtics 2nd pick
other team 2nd pick

Other team Receives:
Jason Collins
Cash

Then, sign Eddie House and Chris Andersen.

Rajon Rondo/Jason Terry/Eddie House
Courney Lee/Jason Terry/Dionte Xmas
Paul Pierce/Jeff Green/Kris Joseph
Josh Smith/Jared Sullinger/Chris Wilcox
Kevin Garnett/Darko Milicic/Chris Andersen

That would be the best or 2nd best team in the league. We would be scary good defensively, in transition, and we still have a really good bench. Josh Smith would deffinately improve our team.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Chris on October 09, 2012, 03:04:07 PM
My Trade Idea:

Celtics Recieve:
Josh Smith

Hawks Recieve:
Avery Bradley
Fab Melo
Brandon Bass
Celtics 1st pick
Celtics 2nd pick
other team 2nd pick

Other team Receives:
Jason Collins
Cash

Then, sign Eddie House and Chris Andersen.

Rajon Rondo/Jason Terry/Eddie House
Courney Lee/Jason Terry/Dionte Xmas
Paul Pierce/Jeff Green/Kris Joseph
Josh Smith/Jared Sullinger/Chris Wilcox
Kevin Garnett/Darko Milicic/Chris Andersen

That would be the best or 2nd best team in the league. We would be scary good defensively, in transition, and we still have a really good bench. Josh Smith would deffinately improve our team.

I am pretty sure that trade would not work, because it would put the C's over the luxury tax threshold, even if Smith waives his 15% trade kicker.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: celticmania on October 09, 2012, 03:12:19 PM
My Trade Idea:

Celtics Recieve:
Josh Smith

Hawks Recieve:
Avery Bradley
Fab Melo
Brandon Bass
Celtics 1st pick
Celtics 2nd pick
other team 2nd pick

Other team Receives:
Jason Collins
Cash

Then, sign Eddie House and Chris Andersen.

Rajon Rondo/Jason Terry/Eddie House
Courney Lee/Jason Terry/Dionte Xmas
Paul Pierce/Jeff Green/Kris Joseph
Josh Smith/Jared Sullinger/Chris Wilcox
Kevin Garnett/Darko Milicic/Chris Andersen

That would be the best or 2nd best team in the league. We would be scary good defensively, in transition, and we still have a really good bench. Josh Smith would deffinately improve our team.

I am pretty sure that trade would not work, because it would put the C's over the luxury tax threshold, even if Smith waives his 15% trade kicker.

Thanks for the feed-back. I never really understood the tax threshold and how it works.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Moranis on October 09, 2012, 03:16:03 PM
My Trade Idea:

Celtics Recieve:
Josh Smith

Hawks Recieve:
Avery Bradley
Fab Melo
Brandon Bass
Celtics 1st pick
Celtics 2nd pick
other team 2nd pick

Other team Receives:
Jason Collins
Cash

Then, sign Eddie House and Chris Andersen.

Rajon Rondo/Jason Terry/Eddie House
Courney Lee/Jason Terry/Dionte Xmas
Paul Pierce/Jeff Green/Kris Joseph
Josh Smith/Jared Sullinger/Chris Wilcox
Kevin Garnett/Darko Milicic/Chris Andersen

That would be the best or 2nd best team in the league. We would be scary good defensively, in transition, and we still have a really good bench. Josh Smith would deffinately improve our team.

I am pretty sure that trade would not work, because it would put the C's over the luxury tax threshold, even if Smith waives his 15% trade kicker.
well it would work, just not sure Boston would do it.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Moranis on October 09, 2012, 03:20:47 PM
How about this 3 team trade

Boston - Josh Smith
Atlanta - Anderson Varejao, Fab Melo, Jason Collins
Cleveland - Brandon Bass, Avery Bradley
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: bucknersrevenge on October 09, 2012, 03:24:40 PM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen.

I agree, except I would leave Melo out of that list if it would help to get Smith.

I know Smith has a bad shot selection, but I don't see why he can't improve his shot selection.

Because he's been in the league 8 years and it's no better now than when he started?

I can understand the appeal of Smith.  He's a great talent and young enough to pair with Rondo for another 5+ years, but I think folks are underestimating the trouble that comes with a guy who's going to turn 27 and still plays stupid on the court.
Mike

Right. Guys like Darko Milicic...I mean Paul Pierce...I mean Josh Smith who play stupid at age 27 are more trouble than they're worth.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: kozlodoev on October 09, 2012, 03:26:48 PM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen.

I agree, except I would leave Melo out of that list if it would help to get Smith.

I know Smith has a bad shot selection, but I don't see why he can't improve his shot selection.

Because he's been in the league 8 years and it's no better now than when he started?

I can understand the appeal of Smith.  He's a great talent and young enough to pair with Rondo for another 5+ years, but I think folks are underestimating the trouble that comes with a guy who's going to turn 27 and still plays stupid on the court.
Mike

Right. Guys like Darko Milicic...I mean Paul Pierce...I mean Josh Smith who play stupid at age 27 are more trouble than they're worth.
Getting Josh Smith ties up considerably more resources than grabbing Darko Milicic off the waiver wire. The Paul Pierce comparison is a fair one -- except that Pierce was immensely more talented at 27 than Josh Smith.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: celticmania on October 09, 2012, 03:27:31 PM
How about this 3 team trade

Boston - Josh Smith
Atlanta - Anderson Varejao, Fab Melo, Jason Collins
Cleveland - Brandon Bass, Avery Bradley

Don't know if it works but seems like a good trade. Picks would need to be involved for Atlanta to agree. Probably like 3 future 1st rounders.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: bucknersrevenge on October 09, 2012, 03:30:56 PM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen.

I agree, except I would leave Melo out of that list if it would help to get Smith.

I know Smith has a bad shot selection, but I don't see why he can't improve his shot selection.

Because he's been in the league 8 years and it's no better now than when he started?

I can understand the appeal of Smith.  He's a great talent and young enough to pair with Rondo for another 5+ years, but I think folks are underestimating the trouble that comes with a guy who's going to turn 27 and still plays stupid on the court.
Mike

Right. Guys like Darko Milicic...I mean Paul Pierce...I mean Josh Smith who play stupid at age 27 are more trouble than they're worth.
Getting Josh Smith ties up considerably more resources than grabbing Darko Milicic off the waiver wire. The Paul Pierce comparison is a fair one -- except that Pierce was immensely more talented at 27 than Josh Smith.

Point taken on Milicic although the argument was not about resources. It was about Josh Smith being a "stupid player" at age 27 and how that in and of itself...is trouble.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: badshar on October 09, 2012, 03:46:44 PM
I really wished that we could have had Smith this year.

I am not ready to give up anyone from our team through a trade for three reasons:

1. Just to get salaries to match, we have to give too many people.

2. Past experience has proved that mid-season trades aren't always the best thing for a team that wants to win a championship that year. Players are not able to develop chemistry that quickly. I prefer having Smith from the beginning of the season or earlier on in the season than midway so there is enough time to get him comfortable with the team and the offensive and defensive system.

3. Giving up Green will cripple our bench. Sure Terry is there for instant offense and the spark off the bench, but let's be real. Terry and Green both together coming off the bench and playing against the other team's bench is very important and very big advantage in our favor. I don't want to give up that. Of course, unless Smith is willing to come off the bench, which he most likely won't, our bench power will severely go down.

I would rather wait for his contract to end by the end of this year, and if his strong desire to become a Celtic is still alive, then he would understand our situation maybe take a little bit of a pay-cut. I am confident that Pierce would be willing to take a pay-cut too if it means we get a huge talent in Josh Smith.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Chris on October 09, 2012, 03:48:48 PM
How about this 3 team trade

Boston - Josh Smith
Atlanta - Anderson Varejao, Fab Melo, Jason Collins
Cleveland - Brandon Bass, Avery Bradley

Just like the other one, this does not work financially.

Based on my calculations (using Shamsports...and yes, I removed Dooling from the calculation), if they make this trade for Smith, and Smith waives his 15% trade kicker, they would still be at $74,523,731 (and the threshold is at $74,307,000 I believe)...and that is only with 12 men on the roster (they would have 3 spots filled with rookie minimum players).  So, they would have to sign one more player to reach the roster minimum, which would put them well over the threshold.
 
Paul Pierce   $16,790,345
Kevin Garnett   $11,566,265
Rajon Rondo   $11,000,000
Jeff Green   $8,385,000
Courtney Lee   $5,000,000
Jason Terry   $5,000,000
Jared Sullinger   $1,306,920
Chris Wilcox   $854,389
Dionte Christmas   $473,604
Kris Joseph   $473,604
Jamar Smith   $473,604
Josh Smith   $13,200,000
Rookie Minimum   $473,604
   $74,997,335

Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: MBunge on October 09, 2012, 04:43:41 PM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen.

I agree, except I would leave Melo out of that list if it would help to get Smith.

I know Smith has a bad shot selection, but I don't see why he can't improve his shot selection.

Because he's been in the league 8 years and it's no better now than when he started?

I can understand the appeal of Smith.  He's a great talent and young enough to pair with Rondo for another 5+ years, but I think folks are underestimating the trouble that comes with a guy who's going to turn 27 and still plays stupid on the court.
Mike

Right. Guys like Darko Milicic...I mean Paul Pierce...I mean Josh Smith who play stupid at age 27 are more trouble than they're worth.

1.  Bringing in Darko to compete for the back-up center spot is completely different than bringing in Josh Smith to be the 2nd or 3rd most important player on the team AND one of the cornerstone's of the team's next 4 or 5 seasons.

2.  Paul Pierce was a better player and much less of an on-court knucklehead than Smith at 27.

3.  If Ainge can sign Smith as a FA after the season, I'm all for it because that's a good cost-benefit bet.  Giving up a couple of playoff caliber rotation players and one or two 1st rounders for Smith, which is what it would likely take, is something else.  That's a lot to give away for stupid.

Mike
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: bucknersrevenge on October 09, 2012, 05:17:18 PM
Currently, my keepers are Rondo, Bradley, Green, Melo, KG, and Pierce.  If some combination of the other guys on the roster could get us Josh Smith, I'd at least be willing to listen.

I agree, except I would leave Melo out of that list if it would help to get Smith.

I know Smith has a bad shot selection, but I don't see why he can't improve his shot selection.

Because he's been in the league 8 years and it's no better now than when he started?

I can understand the appeal of Smith.  He's a great talent and young enough to pair with Rondo for another 5+ years, but I think folks are underestimating the trouble that comes with a guy who's going to turn 27 and still plays stupid on the court.
Mike

Right. Guys like Darko Milicic...I mean Paul Pierce...I mean Josh Smith who play stupid at age 27 are more trouble than they're worth.

1.  Bringing in Darko to compete for the back-up center spot is completely different than bringing in Josh Smith to be the 2nd or 3rd most important player on the team AND one of the cornerstone's of the team's next 4 or 5 seasons.

2.  Paul Pierce was a better player and much less of an on-court knucklehead than Smith at 27.

3.  If Ainge can sign Smith as a FA after the season, I'm all for it because that's a good cost-benefit bet.  Giving up a couple of playoff caliber rotation players and one or two 1st rounders for Smith, which is what it would likely take, is something else.  That's a lot to give away for stupid.

Mike

I don't get the point. You said Josh was too much trouble for stupid at age 27. The Boston Celtics have played throughout the years with stupid at 27. Darko which people love, Paul, Antoine, Tony Allen. All with varying degrees of importance. And yes Paul was less of an on-court knucklehead(whatever that means). Paul was a knucklehead OFF the court instead. Way better.

On your 3rd point I actually kinda agree. It's just really hard trying to make the talent, and the money line up, especially with us up against the hard cap. And it might be simpler to just wait until next year to do it. And even then it will be hard to make a deal that works then. I just don't prescribe to the "oh he's 27 and stupid argument". He takes a few bad jumpers in an isolation offense with no capable pg and ballhogging 2guards. Not to say it's all them but it's funny to me that his shot selection appears to be the only issue people come up with for him. There is too much talent there to fear shot selection.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Onslaught on October 09, 2012, 05:23:58 PM
I don't like the guy much. Not a fan.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: Kane3387 on October 09, 2012, 05:29:25 PM
I have seen a lot of knucklehead comments. Smith hasn't really had any issues off the court. His shot selection has been questioned, but he has never played for a vocal coach with the swag that Doc has and respect he commands. He has never played with a playmaking PG like Rondo and he has never been in a locker room with leaders like KG and Pierce. I think a change of scenery from Atlanta to Boston would do wonders for his efficiency and his overall game.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: nostar on October 11, 2012, 04:52:30 AM
I suddenly realized why I'm not on the Josh Smith bandwagon.

I have watched this guy check out of games. Important games. Games that his team was still competing in. Some call goes against him or his team and he just hangs his head. It's one of the reasons I think Demarcus Cousins and John Wall aren't shoe-ins for NBA success and why I think Dwight Howard has had limited success in his runs through the playoffs. These guys have talent, no doubt, but they need the will to fight through adversity. I think it's what held Lebron back for so long too.

I don't think Smith has that trait and I think once KG retires we're going to have a pretty big hole to fill. If Smith can learn how to keep his head in the games that matter I'll reverse my position but until then he's just a fringe all-star on an 8th seed at best.
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: wdleehi on October 11, 2012, 07:11:30 AM
I don't like the guy much. Not a fan.


I don't want him because he falls into the level of player that annoys me. 


The really good defensive player that is a secondary player on offense but is payed like a star.


Think Wallace all those years in Charlotte.  Would love to see that play on your team but not at the cost of other talent because of a cap choking overpay. 
Title: Re: Josh Smith would not significantly upgrade our team..
Post by: snively on October 12, 2012, 02:04:53 AM
I think Smith + Rondo would work beautifully together offensively - very similar to the Nash/Marion duo that was so potent in Phoenix.  The Smith/KG frontcourt pairing is also extremely appealing.

Very difficult to construct a deal that would be pleasing to Atlanta though.  If Jeff Green can play his way into positive trade value, maybe.

I think there is a HUGE difference offensively with Nash/Marion from Rondo/Smith, because of the dramatically different shooting abilities.  But, defensively, Rondo and Smith would be a scary combination.

I agree that there just aren't many deals that make much sense for both teams though.

Not that huge.  Rondo compares pretty favorably to Nash as a transition creator (the most powerful aspect of the Nash/Marion tandem).  Smith, like Marion, needs a great transition PG to become a highly efficient scorer (Marion, though a better distance shooter, never outpaced Smith in TS% except when paired with Nash or Kidd).

Of course there's the difference between Nash and Rondo's shooting, but the point is, Rondo could make Smith a weapon like Marion was with Nash.

I've seen Kidd and Martin thrown out as a comparison too, which is solid, but I think Smith would be quite a bit more potent/efficient than Martin.